Bacterial infection in dogs with aspiration pneumonia at referral

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In dogs, antimicrobial drugs are widely prescribed for aspiration pneumonia (AP) despite poor documentation of bacterial infection in AP (b-AP) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis. Interpretating discordant cytology and culture results is challenging, contributing to lack of a criterion standard, and highlighting differences between veterinary and human medical criteria for b-AP. OBJECTIVES: Determine how many dogs with AP had BALF collection and differences in diagnosis of b-AP using veterinary vs human medical criteria. Report findings of noninvasive markers (e.g. fever, band neutrophilia, radiographic severity score) in dogs with and without b-AP. ANIMALS: Retrospective cohort study of client-owned dogs (n = 429) with AP at 2 university veterinary hospitals. Twenty-four dogs met enrollment criteria. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were radiographic diagnosis of AP, ≥1 risk factor, CBC findings, and BALF cytology and culture results. Veterinary medical b-AP criteria were cytology findings compatible with sepsis with or without positive culture, or cytology findings not consistent with sepsis and positive culture (≥1.7 × 10 cfu/mL). Human medical b-AP criteria required culture with ≥10 cfu/mL or > 7% cells with intracellular bacteria on cytology. RESULTS: Only 24/429 dogs met all enrollment criteria; 379/429 dogs lacked BALF collection. Diagnosis of b-AP differed using veterinary (79%) vs human (29%) medical criteria. Fever, band neutrophils and high radiographic scores were noted in dogs with and without b-AP. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Lack of routine BALF collection hampers definitive recognition of bacterial infection in AP. Differences in dogs meeting veterinary vs human medical definitions for b-AP and usefulness of noninvasive markers warrant further study to improve understanding of the role of bacteria in AP.