Barbed suture versus preperitoneal ventral patch in medium-size ventral hernia repair: randomized clinical trial.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>This study aimed to compare preperitoneal ventral mesh patch with barbed suture in ventral hernia repair, evaluating recurrence rates and complications, and to assess the safety of preperitoneal patch placement.<h4>Methods</h4>In this randomized clinical trial, adult patients undergoing ventral hernia repair at Karlskoga Hospital between 2020 and 2023 were randomized 1 : 1 to either a ventral mesh patch repair group or a non-absorbable barbed suture repair group, blinded to patients and outcome assessors. The primary outcome was recurrence detected at clinical examination and CT verification 1 year after surgery. Pain (measured on a visual analogue scale and using the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire), nausea, and surgical site events (including wound infection, haematoma and seroma) were assessed 4 h, 1 week, 1 month, and 4 years after operation.<h4>Results</h4>Of 256 eligible patients, 209 were screened, and 205 were randomized to ventral mesh patch repair (103) or barbed suture repair (102). The hernia recurrence rate at 1 year was lower in the ventral patch repair group (1.9 versus 5.9%), although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.14). The surgical site infection rate at 1 month was significantly lower in the ventral patch group (0.9 versus 6.9%; P = 0.02). At 1 month, the ventral patch repair group had higher 'pain right now' scores on the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire (P = 0.02), although this difference had disappeared by 1 year.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Preperitoneal ventral hernia patch repair is a safe and effective technique with a recurrence rate not statistically significant from that after barbed suture repair. Although postoperative pain scores at 1 month were higher after ventral patch repair, this difference had disappeared by 1 year.