PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomic approach for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis.

Journal:
Transboundary and emerging diseases
Year:
2022
Authors:
Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús et al.
Affiliation:
BRTA Basque Research and Technology Alliance · Spain

Plain-English summary

Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is a serious disease that affects cattle and can have significant health and economic impacts. The usual way to test for TB in cows is through a skin test, but this method can sometimes give incorrect results, especially if the cow has been vaccinated or has other infections. In this study, researchers looked at blood samples from cows with TB and compared them to samples from healthy cows and those with a different disease called paratuberculosis (PTB). They used advanced techniques to identify specific substances in the blood that were different in cows with TB. The results showed that these tests could accurately distinguish between cows with TB and those without, suggesting that this new method could be a helpful addition to current testing practices.

Abstract

Even though enormous efforts and control strategies have been implemented, bovine tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant source of health and socioeconomic concern. The standard method used in TB eradication programs for in vivo detection is the tuberculin skin test. However, the specificity of the tuberculin skin test is affected by infection with non-tuberculous mycobacteria or by vaccination. Thus, some animals are not correctly diagnosed. This study aimed first to identify a plasma metabolic TB profile by high-field (HF) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and second measure this characteristic TB metabolic profile using low-field benchtop (LF) NMR as an affordable molecular technology for TB diagnosis. Plasma samples from cattle diagnosed with TB (derivation set, n = 11), diagnosed with paratuberculosis (PTB, n = 10), PTB-vaccinated healthy control (n = 10) and healthy PTB-unvaccinated control (n = 10) were analyzed by NMR. Unsupervised Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to identify metabolic differences between groups. We identified 14 metabolites significantly different between TB and control animals. The second group of TB animals was used to validate the results (validation set, n = 14). Predictive models based on metabolic fingerprint acquired by both HF and LF NMR spectroscopy successfully identified TB versus control subjects (Area under the curve of Receiver Operating Characteristic over 0.92, in both models; Confidence Interval 0.77-1). In summary, plasma fingerprinting using HF and LF-NMR differentiated TB subjects from uninfected animals, and PTB and PTB-vaccinated subjects who may provide a TB-false positive, highlighting the use of LF-NMR-based metabolomics as a complementary or alternative diagnostic tool to the current diagnostic methods.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34717039/