Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ethyl gallate vs norepinephrine for septic shock in dogs
By Gotes, Jose et al.·Published in Critical care medicine·2012·Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Benefits of ethyl gallate versus norepinephrine in the treatment of cardiovascular collapse in Pseudomonas aeruginosa septic shock in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with septic shock caused by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection were treated with either ethyl gallate, a natural antioxidant, or norepinephrine, a common medication used to raise blood pressure. Both treatments helped improve blood pressure and heart function, but ethyl gallate showed additional benefits, including a lower heart rate and better urine output. This suggests that ethyl gallate could be a promising alternative for treating septic shock in dogs.
People also search for: dog septic shock treatment · ethyl gallate for dogs · norepinephrine side effects in dogs
Abstract
INTERVENTIONS: Vasopressor therapy is required in septic shock to maintain tissue perfusion in the face of hypotension. Unfortunately, there are significant side effects of current vasopressors, and newer agents need to be developed. We recently discovered that ethyl gallate, a nonflavonoid phenolic antioxidant found in food substances, could reverse low mean arterial pressure found in an experimental model of septic shock due to inhibition of hydrogen peroxide signaling. In the present study, we compared the hemodynamic and biochemical effects of ethyl gallate vs. those of the commonly used vasopressor, norepinephrine, in a bacteremic canine model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis in two protocols. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We performed these studies in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs. In the early treatment protocol, we infused P. aeruginosa until mean arterial pressure first decreased to ∼60 mm Hg (about 2-3 hrs), after which we stopped the infusion and randomly administered ethyl gallate or norepinephrine in respective groups. In the late treatment protocol, we administered ethyl gallate or norepinephrine after a sustained ∼5-hr decrease in mean arterial pressure to 60 mm Hg and continued the infusion for the duration of the experiment. We followed parameters for over 10 hrs after the initiation of P. aeruginosa in both groups. We measured stroke work, urine output, serum creatinine, among other parameters, and used serum troponin T as an index of myocardial injury. We found that in both protocols, ethyl gallate and norepinephrine improved mean arterial pressure and stroke work to similar extents over the duration of the study. Particularly in the late treatment protocol, ethyl gallate resulted in a lower heart rate, a lower troponin T, and a greater urine output as compared with norepinephrine (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that phenolic antioxidants, such as ethyl gallate, that inhibit hydrogen peroxide signaling, may represent an alternative class of vasopressors for use in septic shock.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22020237/