PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How Doppler blood pressure detects low blood pressure in anesthetized

By Bourazak, Lisa A & Hofmeister, Erik H·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2018·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Bias, sensitivity, and specificity of Doppler ultrasonic flow detector measurement of blood pressure for detecting and monitoring hypotension in anesthetized dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study involving 146 dogs under anesthesia found that using a Doppler ultrasonic flow detector to measure blood pressure was not very reliable for spotting low blood pressure (hypotension). The device showed a sensitivity of about 69% to 66% and a specificity of around 82% to 87%, meaning it missed some cases of hypotension and sometimes gave false positives. Factors like the dog's breed or the type of catheter used did not significantly affect the accuracy of the readings. Overall, the Doppler method was deemed unreliable for monitoring blood pressure in anesthetized dogs.

People also search for: dog low blood pressure during surgery · Doppler blood pressure measurement accuracy in dogs · monitoring anesthesia blood pressure in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the bias, sensitivity, and specificity of Doppler ultrasonic flow detector measurement of blood pressure (DBPM) to detect hypotension in dogs with various disease states and to determine whether patient characteristics could affect accuracy of DBPM in dogs. DESIGN Prospective cross-sectional study. ANIMALS 146 client-owned dogs undergoing general anesthesia at a veterinary teaching hospital between April 2007 and August 2010. PROCEDURES Data collected for each dog were breed, limb conformation, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, anesthetic protocol, surgical procedure, arterial catheter size and location, and DBPM location. Doppler and invasive blood pressure measurements (IBPMs; criterion standard) were simultaneously recorded every 5 minutes throughout anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as mean arterial blood pressure < 60 mm Hg or DBPM < 90 mm Hg. Repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis was performed to determine bias between DBPMs and IBPMs. Overall sensitivity and specificity of DBPM to detect hypotension were calculated with 2 methods, and values were recalculated for specific patient groups and compared. RESULTS Bias of DBPM was 2.8 mm Hg with wide 95% limits of agreement (-46.4 to 51.9 mm Hg). For the 2 calculation methods, sensitivity of DBPM to detect hypotension was 69.2% and 66.7% and specificity was 82.2% and 86.8%. No significant differences in sensitivity or specificity were identified regarding limb conformation, gauge of catheter (20 vs 22) used for IBPM, or side (ipsilateral or contralateral) of paired measurements. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results indicated that in dogs of the present study, DBPM was unreliable for detecting hypotension.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30451616/