Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Restoring breathing in dogs with paralyzed voice box using implants
By Nomura, Kenichiro et al.·Published in The Laryngoscope·2010·Department of Otolaryngology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Bilateral motion restored to the paralyzed canine larynx with implantable stimulator.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of four dogs with laryngeal paralysis, which caused breathing difficulties, underwent surgery to implant a device that stimulates the muscles controlling their vocal cords. After the procedure, the dogs showed significant improvement in their ability to breathe and exercise normally. The stimulation helped open their airways, allowing them to walk comfortably for longer periods without any signs of aspiration (food or liquid entering the lungs). This treatment proved effective over the long term, restoring their quality of life.
People also search for: dog laryngeal paralysis treatment · dog breathing problems surgery · canine vocal cord stimulation
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Bilateral stimulation of posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscles offers a physiologic approach to restore ventilation to a normal level in case of bilateral laryngeal paralysis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a new generation stimulator in restoring ventilation and exercise tolerance. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of four canines over 8-20 months. METHODS: A Genesis XP stimulator and electrodes were implanted and recurrent laryngeal nerves were sectioned and repaired bilaterally. In bimonthly sessions, vocal fold movement resulted from PCA stimulation or induced hypercapnea, was measured endoscopically in the anesthetized animal. Exercise tolerance was measured on a treadmill and swallowing function was examined endoscopically and radiographically. RESULTS: During the denervation phase, there was minimal ventilatory compromise and near-normal exercise tolerance. PCA stimulation produced only nominal abduction. During the reinnervation phase, synkinetic reinnervation became significant, resulting in a narrowed passive airway and paradoxical glottic closure during hypercapnea. Animals were stridorous and could walk for only 1-2 minutes. Bilateral PCA stimulation increased glottal area, equaling that of a normally innervated animal. Exercise tolerance was also normal. The optimal stimulus paradigm for the synkinetically reinnervated larynx was not different from that for the innervated larynx. Stimulation remained efficacious over the study period. Lead integrity could be maintained by prevention of device migration. There was no evidence of aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that ventilatory compromise only occurs following faulty reinnervation. Bilateral PCA stimulation can restore ventilation and exercise tolerance completely without aspiration over the long term.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21053243/