Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bioequivalence of two ciclosporin A forms given once to dogs
By Navarro, C et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2016·Medical Department, France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Bioequivalence study between two formulations of ciclosporin A (Cyclavance® oral solution and Atopica® soft capsules) following a single oral administration to dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 40 healthy dogs was given either a new oral solution called Cyclavance or a capsule called Atopica to treat atopic dermatitis (a skin allergy). Both treatments were found to work similarly in the dogs, meaning they can be used interchangeably. While some dogs experienced mild side effects like salivation, vomiting, or diarrhea, most tolerated both medications well. This study suggests that pet owners can choose either formulation for their dog's skin issues with confidence.
People also search for: dog skin allergy treatment · Cyclavance vs Atopica for dogs · side effects of Atopica in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ciclosporin is a selective immunomodulator used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in dogs. A new 100 mg/ml oral solution formulation (Cyclavance®, Virbac) was developed as a pharmaceutical equivalent to the marketed capsule formulations (Atopica®, Novartis Animal Health) containing 25, 50 mg, or 100 mg of ciclosporin A. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the pharmacokinetic profiles and bioequivalence of the two formulations following a single oral administration to dogs. This randomised, two-period, two-sequence, crossover bioequivalence study was conducted in 40 healthy dogs under fasting conditions. Each dog received either one 50 mg capsule of Atopica® or 0.5 ml of Cyclavance®. After dosing, blood samples were collected during a 48-h time period at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h. Blood ciclosporin A concentrations were measured by using an HPLC-MS/MS method. Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Kel were determined for the two ciclosporin formulations. Bioequivalence was to be concluded if the 90% confidence intervals were within the range of 80% to 125% for Cmax and AUC0-t. Dogs were monitored once daily throughout the study period for adverse effects. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals for Cyclavance®/Atopica® mean ratios of the log-transformed pharmacokinetic variables Cmax and AUC0-t were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80% to 125% (Point estimate: 101.2% and 101.4% respectively). Except for salivation reported after administration of both products, or vomiting and diarrhoea reported after Atopica® administration, both formulations were well tolerated in the 40 healthy dogs over the 48-h study period. CONCLUSIONS: The two ciclosporin oral formulations demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic profiles and were found to be bioequivalent, and therefore, interchangeable.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26970736/