Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: Participant-Level Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials at Twenty-Four to Thirty-Six Months.

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Biologic mesh has been used increasingly in complex ventral hernia repair despite limited evidence at low risk of bias supporting its use. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> We performed a participant-level analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing biologic to synthetic mesh with complex ventral hernia repair at 24 to 36 months. Primary outcome was major complication (composite of mesh infection, recurrence, reoperation, or death) at 24 to 36 months post-operative. Secondary outcomes included length of index hospital stay, surgical site occurrence, surgical site infection, and death. Outcomes were assessed using both frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear regression models. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 252 patients from two RCTs were included, 126 patients randomized to the intervention arm of biologic and 126 patients to the control of synthetic mesh with median follow-up of 29 (23, 38) months. Major complication occurred in 33 (33%) patients randomized to biologic, and 39 (38%) patients randomized to synthetic mesh, (relative risk [RR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.31; p value = 0.600). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that compared with synthetic mesh, biologic mesh had similar probability of major complications at 24 to 36 months post-operative. The remainder of outcomes demonstrated slight benefit with synthetic mesh as opposed to biologic mesh except for mesh infection. However, under a frequentist framework, no outcome was statistically different. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair, there was no benefit for patients receiving biologic versus synthetic mesh at 24 to 36 months post-operative.