Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparing 3 surgeries for torn knee ligament in dogs
By Pinna, Stefania et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2020·Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Bologna Healing Stifle Injury Index: A Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 53 dogs with a torn cranial cruciate ligament (a common knee injury) underwent surgery using one of three different techniques: Paatsama, Tight-Rope, or tibial tuberosity advancement. After surgery, the dogs were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months to see how well they were healing. All surgical methods led to positive outcomes, but the study highlighted differences in recovery speed and owner versus vet assessments of healing. This research suggests that the Bologna Healing Stifle Injury Index (BHSII) can be a helpful tool for tracking recovery in dogs after this type of injury.
People also search for: dog knee injury surgery options · cranial cruciate ligament tear recovery · dog stifle surgery outcomes
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study was to test the efficacy of the Bologna Healing Stifle Injury Index (BHSII) in assessing the medium-term outcomes of dogs treated for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. This tool can be used for comparison across surgical interventions. The study population included 53 dogs with unilateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture treated using either Paatsama, Tight-Rope or tibial tuberosity advancement techniques, and 20 orthopedically sound dogs for comparative purposes. The BHSII was utilized for all the treated dogs at the time of surgery, and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, while it was utilized twice in the control group. Although all the techniques achieved a successful outcome at the end of the evaluation, the application of the BHSII permitted differentiating results at each time point and stimulating discussion regarding the rapidity and degree of the healing process for each technique. It also pointed out some incongruities between the owner's and the clinician's assessment of the process. These achievements demonstrated that the BHSII should be considered by the research and clinical communities as an effective and easy tool which can be used as a repeatable and standardized method of comparison of the progress at different time points toward a final good outcome in dogs treated for cranial cruciate ligament rupture.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33195546/