PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Bone healing with stem cells and fibronectin in dog dental implant

By Sánchez-Garcés, Maria Àngels et al.·Published in The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2017·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Bone Regeneration Using Adipose-Derived Stem Cells with Fibronectin in Dehiscence-Type Defects Associated with Dental Implants: An Experimental Study in a Dog Model.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 18 dogs underwent surgery to create bone defects in their mouths while dental implants were placed. Researchers tested different treatments to see if using a special coating with stem cells from fat (adipose-derived stem cells) would help the bone heal better compared to standard materials. After monitoring the dogs for up to three months, they found that the stem cell treatment did not significantly improve bone healing or the connection between the bone and the implant compared to other methods. Overall, the study suggests that this particular stem cell approach may not enhance bone regeneration in these cases.

People also search for: dog dental implant recovery · stem cells for dog bone healing · dog mouth surgery complications

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the bone regeneration potential of a ceramic biomaterial coated with fibronectin and adipose-derived stem cells covered in three-wall critical-size defects associated with dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a total of 18 dogs, four dehiscence-type and critical-size defects were created surgically in the edentulous alveolar ridge with the simultaneous placement of dental implants. Defects were randomly regenerated using biomaterials coated with particulate ß-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), β-TCP with fibronectin (Fn) (β-TCP-Fn), and β-TCP with a combination of Fn and autologous adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) (β-TCP-Fn-ADSCs), leaving one defect as the control. The animals were divided into three groups according to the time of euthanasia (1, 2, or 3 months). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences between the three study groups (β-TCP, β-TCP-Fn, β-TCP-Fn-ADSCs) and the control group in the total area of bone regeneration and mineralized and nonmineralized tissue at 1, 2, and 3 months of healing were not observed. At 2 months, defects treated with β-TCP-Fn-ADSCs showed a significant decrease in the percentage of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) as compared with the β-TCP-Fn (P = .041) and control (P = .012) groups. At 3 months of healing, however, significant differences in BIC between the three study groups and controls were not found (P = .388). CONCLUSION: The use of ADSCs in the bone regeneration processes of dehiscencetype defects associated with simultaneous implant insertion does not seem to improve the area of bone regeneration or the percentage of BIC compared with other biomaterials or the control alveolar defect.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28291861/