Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Canine atopic dermatitis: validation of recorded diagnosis against practice records in 335 insured Swedish dogs.
- Journal:
- Acta veterinaria Scandinavica
- Year:
- 2006
- Authors:
- Nødtvedt, Ane et al.
- Affiliation:
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at 335 insured dogs in Sweden that were diagnosed with canine atopic dermatitis (CAD), which is a type of allergic skin condition. The researchers checked the dogs' medical records to see if the diagnosis was correct. They found that while all the dogs had some kind of skin issue, most of them (about 98%) had an allergic skin disease, but it was hard to tell how many were truly atopic because many records didn't include information about food trials. Among a smaller group of dogs that did undergo food trials, those that responded to the diet were more likely to show signs of stomach issues. Overall, the study found that the diagnosis in the insurance records matched well with what the veterinarians noted, but it raised a concern that some vets might not have ruled out food allergies before diagnosing CAD.
Abstract
A cross-sectional study of insured Swedish dogs with a recorded diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) was performed. In order to validate the correctness of this specific diagnosis in the insurance database, medical records were requested by mail from the attending veterinarians. All dogs with a reimbursed claim for the disease during 2002 were included in the original study sample (n = 373). Medical records were available for 335 individuals (response rate: 89.8%). By scrutinizing the submitted records it was determined that all dogs had been treated for dermatologic disease, and that 327 (97.6%) could be considered to have some allergic skin disease. However, as information regarding dietary trial testing was missing in many dogs the number that were truly atopic could not be determined. The clinical presentation and nature of test diet for dogs with or without response to dietary trial testing was compared for a subset of 109 individuals that had undergone such testing. The only significant difference between these two groups was that the proportion of dogs with reported gastrointestinal signs was higher in the group that subsequently responded to a diet trial. In conclusion, the agreement between the recorded diagnosis in the insurance database and the clinical manifestations recorded in the submitted medical records was considered acceptable. The concern was raised that many attending veterinarians did not exclude cutaneous adverse food reactions before making the diagnosis of CAD.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16987404/