PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Is your dog diagnosed with atopic dermatitis? Here's what we found

By Nødtvedt, Ane et al.·Published in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica·2006·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Canine atopic dermatitis: validation of recorded diagnosis against practice records in 335 insured Swedish dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 335 insured dogs in Sweden, diagnosed with canine atopic dermatitis (CAD), had their medical records reviewed to confirm the accuracy of their diagnosis. Most of these dogs were treated for skin problems, and nearly all were found to have some form of allergic skin disease. However, many records lacked information on dietary trials, which are important for ruling out food allergies. The study highlighted that some veterinarians may not have fully excluded food reactions before diagnosing CAD. Overall, the diagnosis was generally found to be accurate, but more thorough testing could improve certainty.

People also search for: dog skin allergies treatment · canine atopic dermatitis symptoms · food allergies in dogs

Abstract

A cross-sectional study of insured Swedish dogs with a recorded diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) was performed. In order to validate the correctness of this specific diagnosis in the insurance database, medical records were requested by mail from the attending veterinarians. All dogs with a reimbursed claim for the disease during 2002 were included in the original study sample (n = 373). Medical records were available for 335 individuals (response rate: 89.8%). By scrutinizing the submitted records it was determined that all dogs had been treated for dermatologic disease, and that 327 (97.6%) could be considered to have some allergic skin disease. However, as information regarding dietary trial testing was missing in many dogs the number that were truly atopic could not be determined. The clinical presentation and nature of test diet for dogs with or without response to dietary trial testing was compared for a subset of 109 individuals that had undergone such testing. The only significant difference between these two groups was that the proportion of dogs with reported gastrointestinal signs was higher in the group that subsequently responded to a diet trial. In conclusion, the agreement between the recorded diagnosis in the insurance database and the clinical manifestations recorded in the submitted medical records was considered acceptable. The concern was raised that many attending veterinarians did not exclude cutaneous adverse food reactions before making the diagnosis of CAD.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16987404/