Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Markers of inflammation and treatment response in dogs
By Martínez-Subiela, Silvia et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2014·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Canine demodicosis: the relationship between response to treatment of generalised disease and markers for inflammation and oxidative status.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with generalized demodicosis, a skin condition caused by mites, showed higher levels of certain inflammation markers compared to healthy dogs and those with localized demodicosis. These dogs were treated with oral ivermectin, a common medication for this condition, and their blood was tested before and after 30 days of treatment. The results indicated that the inflammation markers decreased and began to normalize with treatment, suggesting that monitoring these markers can help evaluate how well the treatment is working.
People also search for: dog skin problems treatment · generalized demodicosis in dogs · ivermectin for dog mites · dog inflammation markers
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determination of acute phase proteins and markers of oxidative status may be of value for evaluating the severity of disease and the response to treatment. In canine demodicosis, there is no information available regarding the use of such analytes to discriminate between localized and generalized demodicosis or to monitor the response to treatment. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: The aim was to measure analytes related to inflammation and oxidative stress in dogs with localized or generalized demodicosis. In cases of generalized demodicosis, the intention was to study these analytes before and after a period of treatment. ANIMALS: Serum was obtained from three groups: Group 1, healthy dogs; Group 2, dogs with localized demodicosis; and Group 3, dogs with generalized demodicosis. METHODS: Animals from Groups 1 and 2 were sampled at the point of diagnosis. Dogs in Group 3 were treated with oral ivermectin 1% at 0.6 mg/kg once daily, and samples were collected at the point of diagnosis and after 30 days of treatment. C-Reactive protein, haptoglobin, albumin, butyrylcholinesterase, paraoxonase-1 and total antioxidant capacity were measured. RESULTS: Dogs with generalized demodicosis had significantly higher concentrations of C-reactive protein and haptoglobin and lower butyrylcholinesterase activity than dogs in Groups 1 and 2. Dogs in Group 3 also had lower paraoxonase-1 than those in Group 2, The analytes tended to normalize during treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: There was an evident acute phase response and changes in selected oxidative state analytes in generalized demodicosis that do not occur in the localized form. These changes could be used for monitoring the response to treatment.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24800264/