Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Infections in dogs with heart pacemakers and PDA devices
By Fine, Deborah M & Tobias, Anthony H·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2007·Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Cardiovascular device infections in dogs: report of 8 cases and review of the literature.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Two dogs with infected pacemakers were treated with antibiotics alone but sadly had to be euthanized due to complications from the infection. In contrast, four other dogs with pacemaker infections received both antibiotics and had their devices replaced, and all of them fully recovered. Additionally, two puppies with infections from patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) occlusion devices were treated; one recovered with surgery and antibiotics, while the other was euthanized without treatment. This highlights the importance of removing infected devices for a better chance of recovery.
People also search for: dog pacemaker infection treatment · puppy PDA occlusion device infection · dog heart device complications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infection is an infrequent but major complication of cardiovascular device implantation. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment of patients with cardiovascular implant infection with antibiotic therapy and removal of the device is superior to antibiotic therapy alone. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for dogs that received a cardiovascular device from June 2001 to August 2006 at the University of Minnesota Veterinary Medical Center and the University of Missouri Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. RESULTS: Six of 63 (9.5%) pacemaker systems and 2 of 47 (4.3%) patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) occlusion devices became infected. Median time from procedure to diagnosis of implant infection was 62 days (range, 5 to 419). Median age of dogs with pacemaker infections was 8.5 years (range, 6.2 to 11.9). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus spp were the most commonly cultured isolates. Four dogs were treated with antibiotics and pacemaker replacement. All 4 recovered completely from their infections. One was alive at the end of the study period, and 3 had been euthanized. However, the reasons for euthanasia were unrelated to pacemaker infection. In contrast, both dogs with infected pacemakers that were treated with antibiotics alone were euthanized because of complications attributable to infection. Infection of PDA occlusion devices occurred in puppies < 16 weeks of age, and Pasteurella spp were isolated from both. One was successfully treated with a combination of antibiotics and surgery, and the other was euthanized without treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Antibiotic therapy alone is associated with chronic complications in patients with cardiovascular implants and is unlikely to effect a cure.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18196736/