PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Dog developed painful skin necrosis after meloxicam injection

By C Reimann et al.·Published in Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift·2020·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Challenges in Managing Local Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions (CADR) – A Case Report

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A 10-year-old male miniature short-haired dachshund developed lameness in his front leg after receiving a subcutaneous injection of meloxicam, a pain medication. Over the next few days, he experienced bloody diarrhea and vomiting, and the injection site became painful and swollen. A biopsy revealed severe skin damage due to a local cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) to the medication. The affected skin was surgically removed, and with proper wound care, the dog made a full recovery.

People also search for: dog skin reaction to medication · dachshund bloody diarrhea treatment · meloxicam side effects in dogs

Abstract

This report describes a rare case of a presumed local cutaneous drug reaction in a 10-year old, male miniature short-haired dachshund after subcutaneous injection of meloxicam and maropitant. The dog was presented with cubital joint lameness and meloxicam was injected subcutaneously. Bloody diarrhoea and bloody emesis developed over the next three days. After a repeated subcutaneous application of meloxicam and maropitant into the left thoracic wall, the skin and subcutis at the injection site indurated and became painful over an area of approx. 8x8cm. The skin became locally necrotic and was demarcated within a few days. Histopathology of deep skin biopsies revealed severe, necrosuppurative dermatitis, panniculitis and vasculitis with marked edema and deep sequestrating pannicular necrosis. Perivascular eosinophils and vascular thrombosis were present in deeper areas of the panniculus and cutaneous muscle. Microbiological culturing failed to identify bacterial growth. Based on the treatment history, clinical changes, histopathology and the lack of laboratory data suggestive of relevant differential diagnoses, a local cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) was favoured. Surgical removal of affected areas and an open wound management were successful and the dog fully recovered. This rare case of localized canine CADR illustrates the importance of a precise medical history, a strategie to exclude relevant differential diagnoses and the difficulties in ultimately confirming localized CADR in veterinary medicine.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.2376/1439-0299-2020-14