Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Arterial catheter use and complications in ICU dogs and cats
By Hagley, Matthew J et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2021·Faculty of Biology, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Characteristics of arterial catheter use and related complications in dogs and cats in an intensive care unit.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A study looked at the use of arterial catheters in 198 dogs and 29 cats in an intensive care unit to see how often complications occurred. Most catheters were placed in the dogs' and cats' legs, and they typically stayed in for about a day. Minor complications happened in about 19% of dogs and 17% of cats, but only a small number of catheters had to be removed due to these issues. Overall, the study found that using arterial catheters is generally safe for both dogs and cats, although more research is needed, especially for cats with longer catheter use.
People also search for: dog ICU catheter complications · cat arterial catheter safety · pet ICU care risks
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics of arterial catheter use, including indwelling times and reasons for removal, and analyze potential risk factors for complications based on patient- and catheter-related variables. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study from July 2012 to September 2016. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: One hundred ninety-eight dogs and 29 cats with an arterial catheter monitored in the ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A questionnaire was used to obtain patient and catheter information for arterial catheters monitored in the ICU during the study period. Two hundred twenty-seven catheters met the inclusion criteria. Most catheters were placed in the dorsal metatarsal artery in dogs (90.4%) and either the dorsal metatarsal artery (51.7%) or coccygeal artery (48.3%) in cats. Weights ranged from 1.5 to 64 kg in dogs and 0.77 to 8.7 kg in cats. The median indwelling time was 24 hours for dogs and 12 hours for cats. Minor complications occurred in 19.2% of catheters in dogs and 17.2% of those in cats with removal of catheter due to complications in 13 of 198 (6.6%) for dogs and 2 of 29 (6.9%) for cats. There was no association between the incidence of complications and patient weight, catheter indwelling time, species, insertion site, catheter size, or level of consciousness during placement. There was also no association between the method of catheter maintenance (intermittent flushing or continuous pressure transducer) and the failure of a catheter to aspirate or flush. CONCLUSIONS: Arterial catheter-related complications were relatively frequent, but most complications were minor and did not justify removal of the catheter. This suggests that the use of arterial catheters in both species is relatively safe. However, further research is needed to assess complications related to longer catheter indwelling times, particularly in cats.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34124836/