PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Heartworm prevention success in dogs in Rio de Janeiro high-risk area

By Labarthe, Norma Vollmer et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2015·Programa de P&#xf3, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Chemoprophylaxis of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy 1856) infection at a high challenge environment.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs in Brazil were tested for heartworm infection, a serious condition caused by a parasite. They were given two different topical treatments: one group received a combination of moxidectin and imidacloprid, while the other group received selamectin. The results showed that none of the dogs treated with moxidectin and imidacloprid became infected, while four dogs treated with selamectin did. This suggests that the moxidectin and imidacloprid combination is highly effective in preventing heartworm infections in areas where the risk is high.

People also search for: dog heartworm prevention · moxidectin imidacloprid for dogs · selamectin heartworm treatment

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency of canine heartworm infection in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil was high before chemoprophylactic treatment was available, with one of the highest rates of infection (52.5 %) found among dogs living on the eastern shore of the state. Following the launch of a chemoprophylactic product, the rate of infection gradually decreased, and new infections were rarely reported. After 2005, outbreaks reported at the eastern shore as well as for new infections in other areas of high infection frequency were considered to possibly be related to reduced efficacy of macrocyclic lactones. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of topical heartworm preventatives from different drug families at the high challenge area of the state of Rio de Janeiro. METHODS: A total of 46 dogs, including animals negative for Dirofilaria immitis microfilariae and antigen (Snap 4 Dx, IDEXX Laboratories, USA) at the initial screening were randomly allocated to two monthly treatment groups. Dogs in one group received topical moxidectin + imidacloprid and dogs in the other group received topical selamectin for eight consecutive months. Blood samples were obtained for microfilariae and antigen detection until the eleventh month after the first treatment. Dogs becoming microfilaremic or antigenemic on or before day 180 were considered to be infected prior to the first dose and were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 29 dogs completed the study, including 14 treated with moxidectin + imidacloprid and 15 treated with selamectin. No dogs treated with moxidectin + imidacloprid (0/14) became infected during the treatment period, whereas four dogs of the selamectin group (4/15) became infected. CONCLUSION: Topical moxidectin + imidacloprid is 100 % effective in preventing D. immitis infections in dogs living in a high challenge natural environment.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26459036/