Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Proliferative urethritis in dogs - signs and diagnosis methods
By Borys, Moria A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2019·Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Clinical, histopathologic, cystoscopic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of proliferative urethritis in 22 dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 22 dogs with urethritis, which is inflammation of the urethra, were studied to understand the condition better. Symptoms included discomfort during urination, and some dogs had frond-like lesions in their urethra. The researchers found different types of inflammation in these dogs, and some had bacteria present that standard urine tests didn't detect. This suggests that urine and tissue cultures might not always show the full picture of bacterial infections in dogs with urethritis. Treatment options were not detailed, but understanding the underlying causes can help veterinarians provide better care.
People also search for: dog urethritis symptoms · dog urinary tract infection treatment · why is my dog straining to urinate
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proliferative urethritis (PU) is a lower urinary tract disease of dogs characterized by frond-like lesions in the urethra. The etiology of PU is unknown, although an association with bacterial cystitis is reported. OBJECTIVES: Deep-seated bacterial cystitis is associated with PU, particularly in dogs with neutrophilic or granulomatous inflammation. ANIMALS: Twenty-two client-owned dogs with PU and 5 control dogs euthanized for non-urinary disease. METHODS: In retrospective analysis, medical records of dogs with PU from 1986 to 2016 were reviewed. Signalment, clinical signs, cystoscopic findings, antimicrobial use, and results of urine, bladder, or urethral tissue cultures, if available, were recorded. Histopathology was reviewed and classified as lymphocytic-plasmacytic (LP), neutrophilic, LP-neutrophilic (LPN), granulomatous, or pleocellular. Eubacterial fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on 18 tissue samples (13 cases, 5 controls), with subsequent evaluation of bacterial species. RESULTS: Of the 22 dogs, 9 had LP urethritis, 6 had LPN, 4 had pleocellular, and 3 had neutrophilic urethritis. Of note, 7 of 13 PU samples were FISH+ for adherent or invasive bacteria; 1 of 5 controls were FISH+ for adherent bacteria. Five dogs had negative urine and tissue cultures when FISH was positive. There was no association detected between the type of urethral inflammation and the results of urine and tissue culture or FISH. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The type of inflammation varied widely in these 22 PU cases. Deep-seated bacterial urethritis could be contributing to the inflammatory process in some dogs, regardless of the inflammation type. Urine and tissue cultures likely underestimate bacterial colonization of the urethra in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30516855/