Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
MRSA infections in cats: clinical signs and strain details
By Morris, Daniel O et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2006·Department of Clinical Studies-Philadelphia, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections of cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 46 cats with skin infections was studied to see if they had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or the more treatable methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Both groups showed similar symptoms, but MRSA was found to be resistant to certain antibiotics, making it harder to treat. The study highlighted the importance of testing for the specific type of bacteria and its antibiotic resistance, especially if initial treatments don't work. This research suggests that cats can carry MRSA, which could potentially be passed to humans.
People also search for: cat skin infection MRSA treatment · why is my cat's skin infected · antibiotic resistance in cats · cat infection treatment options
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical information obtained from medical records of cats with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) infections, evaluate antibiograms of MRSA and MSSA for multiple-drug resistance (MDR), and characterize the strain type and staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCC)mec type of each MRSA. SAMPLE POPULATION: 70 S aureus isolates obtained from 46 cats. PROCEDURES: Clinical information obtained from medical records, including signalment, clinical signs, histologic examination of affected tissues, and outcomes, was compared between the 2 groups. Composite antibiograms of MRSA and MSSA were compared statistically. The MRSA strains were characterized by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and SCCmec typing. RESULTS: No statistical differences in signalment or subjective differences in clinical signs or outcomes were detected between groups with MRSA or MSSA infection. Significant differences in antimicrobial resistance were detected, with MRSA having complete resistance to fluoroquinolone and macrolide antimicrobials, whereas MSSA maintained a high frequency of susceptibility. Seven pulsed-field patterns were observed in 15 MRSA strains; all but 1 were highly related. All MRSA isolates contained a type II SCCmec element. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because MDR cannot be predicted in staphylococcal infections in cats on the basis of clinical signalment, culture and susceptibility testing are recommended whenever initial empirical treatment is unsuccessful. Molecular characterization of MRSA strains suggests that there has been reverse-zoonotic transmission from humans. IMPACT FOR HUMAN MEDICINE: The SCCmec type II element is typically associated with nosocomial MRSA infections of people. Cats may serve as reservoirs for MRSA infections in humans.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16881856/