Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
What splenic nodules or spots on dog spleen ultrasounds mean
By Yankin, Igor et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2020·Oregon State University·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Clinical relevance of splenic nodules or heterogeneous splenic parenchyma assessed by cytologic evaluation of fine-needle samples in 125 dogs (2011-2015).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 125 dogs with splenic nodules or unusual spleen appearance on ultrasound were evaluated to see if these findings indicated serious health issues. Out of these dogs, 25 were found to have significant problems, including 22 cases of cancer. The study identified that larger nodules, multiple target-like nodules, and the presence of fluid in the abdomen were linked to more serious conditions. A scoring system was developed to help veterinarians decide when further testing, like a fine-needle biopsy, is needed. This approach can help catch important health issues earlier.
People also search for: dog splenic nodules ultrasound · dog spleen cancer symptoms · fine-needle biopsy for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Splenic nodules and heterogeneous parenchyma are seen frequently in abdominal ultrasound examinations of dogs, but the clinical importance of these lesions remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether specific ultrasonographic findings correlate with clinically relevant cytologic diagnoses and determine what sonographic features are correlated with these diagnoses. Another objective was to develop a scoring rubric to help clinicians make decisions on whether or not certain ultasonographic findings of the spleen warrant evaluation by fine-needle cytology. ANIMALS: One-hundred twenty-five adult client-owned dogs with ultrasonographically identified splenic nodules, heterogeneous parenchyma, or both. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively searched for ultrasound-guided splenic fine-needle cytology reports. Ultrasonographic images were assessed for nodule number, size, echogenicity and distal enhancement, degree of splenic heterogeneity, and peritoneal fluid. Dogs were divided into 2 groups: those with clinically important or clinically irrelevant cytologic findings. Potentially useful and discriminatory ultrasonographic findings were identified by statistical analysis, and the most useful findings were used to generate the scoring rubric. RESULTS: The clinically important group included 25 of 125 dogs (22 malignancies, 3 suppurative inflammation). Splenic nodules 1-2 cm in diameter, peritoneal fluid, and >1 targetoid nodule were associated with clinically important cytologic findings. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that the scoring rubric was useful for identifying dogs in the clinically important group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Splenic fine-needle cytologic findings identified a clinically relevant diagnosis in 20% of dogs, and larger nodule size, number of targetoid lesions, and presence of peritoneal fluid increase the likelihood of detection of clinically important disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31692075/