Clinical relevance of zebrafish for gene variants testing. Proof-of-principle with SMN1/SMA.

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) results from SMN1 gene loss-of-function (LOF), with disease severity directly linked to the level of remaining SMN protein. Nusinersen, risdiplam, and onasemnogene abeparvovec are revolutionary treatments but should ideally be implemented before clinical symptoms appear. Because of this, prenatal and newborn screenings are increasingly used to identify common SMN1 variants and patients requiring therapy. However, for novel variants, clinicians lack robust analytic tools to predict pathogenicity before irreversible damage occurs. To address this gap, we deployed a zebrafish model presenting smn1-LOF, exhibiting progressive motor defects and death by only six days of age. We evaluated two SMN1-variants of uncertain significance (VUS) identified in newborn infants awaiting definite diagnosis and treatment recommendations. We demonstrated that while known pathogenic variants did not change the disease course, wild-type SMN1 and both infants variants rescued SMA hallmarks in zebrafish, demonstrating the relevance of this approach for VUS-testing within a crucial timeframe for patients. Extending the assay to known SMN1-hypomorphs showed partial rescue, weaker than wild-type or VUS, demonstrating that this approach can also discriminate partial-LOF effects. Both VUS were resolved to be non-pathogenic, and the therapeutic costs of >US$2 million per child were avoided. Beyond SMA, this study provides robust proof-of-principle that the zebrafish represents a powerful translational tool for VUS-analysis, and that such approaches should be considered in clinical settings for supporting diagnosis and treatment decisions.