PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Guided tissue regeneration success for dog bone and gum defects

By Lee, Bonnie L et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2023·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Clinical success of guided tissue regeneration for treating vertical bone and furcation defects in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with advanced gum disease underwent a procedure called guided tissue regeneration (GTR) to treat serious bone loss around their teeth. Out of 112 procedures, about 90% showed improvement in bone depth and health after treatment, especially for vertical bone defects. However, the success rate was lower for furcation defects (where the roots of teeth split), with only about 22% showing improvement. The results suggest that GTR can be an effective option for preserving teeth in dogs, particularly when dealing with vertical bone issues.

People also search for: dog gum disease treatment · guided tissue regeneration for dogs · dog tooth bone loss treatment

Abstract

This study evaluated the clinical success rate of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) for treating advanced periodontal disease in a large canine cohort. A total of 112 GTR procedures performed from 2003-2021 were retrospectively evaluated, including pre- and post-treatment (3-12 months) periodontal probing depths of 104 treated teeth, dental radiographs of 73 treated teeth, and both diagnostic modalities in 64 treated teeth. Probing depth, radiographically apparent bone height, bone graft material, barrier membrane material, and tooth extraction adjacent to the GTR site were investigated as factors affecting success. Vertical bone defects were evaluated separately from furcation defects. GTR was clinically successful, defined as objective improvement in probing depth, objective decrease in radiographic vertical bone defect, and subjective radiographic gain in bone height in 90.3% of vertical bone defects. Success was significantly associated with the magnitude of initial probing depth and the type of barrier membrane used. GTR was clinically successful, defined as objective improvement in furcation probing and subjective radiographic improvement of the bone in the furcation in 22.2% of furcation defects. When F3 lesions were excluded, GTR was successful in 64.3% of furcation defects. GTR is an appropriate treatment to maintain teeth in the oral cavity of dogs with proper client counseling and patient selection, but it is most likely to be successful in vertical defects.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37711437/