Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Using tissue plasminogen activator to treat blood clots in dogs
By Diaz, D M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2022·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Clinical use of tissue plasminogen activator for systemic thrombolysis in dogs and cats.
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs and cats received a medication called tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) to treat blood clots. In dogs, most had significant improvement after treatment, with about 79% surviving to go home. However, cats showed less success, with only 40% surviving, and some experienced worsening kidney issues after treatment. While tPA appears to be a helpful option for dogs with blood clots, more research is needed to understand its effects on cats.
People also search for: dog blood clot treatment · cat kidney injury after blood clot · tPA for dogs and cats
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Systemic administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) is seldomly reported in dogs and cats. ANIMALS: Client-owned animals receiving tPA (2010-2020). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of dogs and cats receiving tPA for distant known/suspected thrombus were reviewed. Fourteen dog visits (24 injections) and five cat visits (six injections) were included. RESULTS: Canine known/suspected thrombus included pulmonary thromboembolism (n=6), intracardiac thrombus (n=4), aortic thrombus (n=1), cranial vena cava thrombus (n=2), and femoral and iliac veins thrombus (n=1). Various canine primary diseases were represented, but open-heart surgery was the most common cause. Median time between diagnosis/suspicion of thrombus and tPA injection was 24.5 h (range, 3-150 h). Mean total tPA dose was 1.0±0.78 mg/kg. Clinical improvement occurred in 93% of dogs. Non-fatal complications were reported in 14% of dogs. Dogs' survival to discharge was 78.6% without identifiable non-survivor characteristics. Feline known/suspected thrombus included unilateral feline aortic thromboembolism (FATE) (n=2), bilateral FATE (n=2), and right renal artery thrombus. Feline primary diseases included cardiomyopathy (n=5). Median time between diagnosis/suspicion of thrombus and tPA injection was 4 h (range, 2-17 h) and median total tPA dose was 1.0 mg/kg (range, 0.6-1.4 mg/kg).Clinical improvement occurred during 40% of the visits. All cats (n=3) with acute kidney injury (AKI) at admission developed worsening AKI and reperfusion injury. Of the remaining two visits, one developed a non-fatal AKI. Cats' survival to discharge was 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic thrombolysis with tPA seems to be effective and safe in dogs. More investigation is needed in cats.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35364502/