Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Spinal and general anesthesia in cats for surgery risks and technique
By Sarotti, Diego et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2019·Centro Veterinario Fossanese, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Combined spinal and general anaesthesia in 58 cats undergoing various surgical procedures: description of technique and retrospective perioperative evaluation.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 58 cats underwent various surgeries using a combination of spinal and general anesthesia. The spinal anesthesia technique involved injecting a mixture of bupivacaine and morphine to help manage pain during surgery. While some cats experienced side effects like low heart rate and low blood pressure, there were no serious complications reported. Overall, the technique was found to be effective with a low rate of procedural failure, especially when the injection was done in the correct area.
People also search for: cat surgery anesthesia side effects · why is my cat's heart rate low after surgery · spinal anesthesia in cats
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the spinal anaesthesia (SA) technique and evaluate the incidence of perioperative complications in cats. METHODS: The anaesthetic records of cats of American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I, II and III, which received general and SA for different surgeries between 2012 and 2016, were examined. SA was administered through a 25 G Quincke needle, using an isobaric solution of bupivacaine and morphine at the level of either the L-Sinterspaces (sternal recumbency) or the L-/L-interspaces (lateral recumbency). Procedural failure rate (PFR), drugs and dose used, heart rate (HR), arterial blood pressure, incidence of bradycardia (HR <100 bpm) and hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] <60 mmHg for at least 5 mins), intraoperative rescue analgesia (iRA) and any other detrimental events and their treatment until discharge were recorded. Abdominal surgery cases were excluded from the intraoperative evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 58 anaesthetic records met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. PFR related to the space of injection (L-Svs L-/L-) was 3/11 (27%) and 1/47 (2%), respectively (= 0.017). The total median dose of intrathecal bupivacaine and morphine was 0.8 (range 0.5-1.6 mg/kg) and 0.10 (0.05-0.18 mg/kg), respectively. Nine of 46 (20%) cats received iRA, and no iRA cases were reported with a dose of bupivacaine higher than 0.8 mg/kg. Median HR and MAP before intrathecal injection (T) and 10 mins after (T) were, respectively, 118 bpm (range 74-190 bpm) and 106 bpm (67-160 bpm) (= 0.005), and 65 mmHg (range 50-94 mmHg) and 52 mmHg (range 35-85 mmHg) (= 0.003). Bradycardia was reported in 18/46 (39%) cats and hypotension in 23/46 (50%) cats. No complications were recorded during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: SA was characterised by a low PFR when performed at the L-/L-interspaces and low postoperative complications. Hypotension and bradycardia were the most common side effects.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30565967/