Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparing manual and automated 3D torso scans in teens with scoliosis
By González-Ruiz JM & Rothstock S.·2026·Society for the Advancement of Applied Computer Science Berlin, Germany·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparative analysis of a manual and an automated 3D landmark digitization method of the torso in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
Plain-English summary
This study looked at a new automated method for measuring the shape of the torso in teenagers with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a condition that causes the spine to curve. Traditionally, doctors use a manual method to identify specific points on the body, but this can be time-consuming and may lead to mistakes. The researchers found that the automated method was able to measure torso shape accurately and consistently, with errors that were not significantly different from the manual method. While the automated approach showed promise and could help reduce radiation exposure from x-rays, it did struggle a bit with capturing all the variations in shape. Overall, the findings suggest that this new method could be useful for monitoring scoliosis in a safer and more efficient way, but there is still room for improvement.
Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often presents with significant 3D asymmetry of the torso, posing challenges for both patients and clinicians. Surface topography, based on the identification of anatomical landmarks, offers a non-invasive alternative to x-rays for monitoring shape changes over time, thereby reducing radiation exposure. However, the current gold standard, a manual landmarking process, is labor intensive and prone to error. Here, we present an automated 3D landmark digitization method designed to address these limitations. We performed the validation comparing the automated 3D landmark digitization method against the manual gQ1old standard across three phases: preliminary error assessment, geometric morphometrics (GMM) shape/size evaluation, and practical allometry application. Our results show that the automated method effectively quantifies torso shape, achieving a nonsignificant measurement error in both groups (23.1 mm in patients with p-value = 0.33; and 20.3 mm in controls with p-value = 0.30). It has also captured variance patterns comparable to the manual approach, showing high agreement for PC1 (0.94; CI95%: 0.91-0.96) and good agreement for PC2 (0.85; CI95%: 0.78-0.90), and performs similarly in assessing allometry, without significant differences in capturing the allometric signal (p-value = 0.09). However, the automated method exhibited reduced ability to capture shape variability, highlighting potential areas for improvement. These results suggest that automated, non-radiographic techniques hold promise for clinical application in tracking AIS progression. Future refinements could further improve accuracy, paving the way for safer and more efficient scoliosis management strategies.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41714373