Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Tacrolimus vs cyclosporine eye drops for dry eye in dogs
By Radziejewski, Krzysztof & Balicki, Ireneusz·Published in Acta veterinaria Hungarica·2016·Veterinary Clinic 'Radwet'·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparative clinical evaluation of tacrolimus and cyclosporine eye drops for the treatment of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 40 dogs with dry eye (keratoconjunctivitis sicca) were treated with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine eye drops to see which worked better. The dogs receiving tacrolimus showed more improvement in tear production and reduction of eye irritation after two months compared to those on cyclosporine, especially in more severe cases. Both treatments helped, but tacrolimus was particularly effective for dogs with advanced symptoms. Overall, dogs treated with tacrolimus had better outcomes, making it a promising option for managing this condition.
People also search for: dog dry eye treatment · tacrolimus vs cyclosporine for dogs · canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca symptoms
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus eye drops in alleviating the clinical symptoms of canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) and to compare this efficacy with that of cyclosporine. The clinical study was conducted on 40 dogs diagnosed with idiopathic KCS. The dogs were divided into two groups of 20 animals each. In Group I, 0.75% cyclosporine eye drops were administered three times a day, while in Group II 0.02% tacrolimus eye drops were given twice daily. In addition, each group was subdivided into three subgroups based on the results of Schirmer tear test I (STT I). Clinical and ophthalmologic examinations were performed prior to the treatment as well as after one and two months of therapy. The application of both tacrolimus and cyclosporine resulted in a significant reduction of neovascularisation after the first and second month of treatment (P < 0.05, P < 0.001); however, in moderate and advanced stages, the observed efficacy of tacrolimus was higher. Across all patients, a significant increase in STT I values was observed after both the first and second month of treatment with tacrolimus (P < 0.01), as well as after two months of treatment with cyclosporine (P < 0.05). In both groups, some patients were observed to exhibit inhibited development of pigmentation, but an analysis of particular clinical cases and statistical data revealed no statistically significant discrepancies in the course of the study. In cases of advanced canine KCS, the efficacy of tacrolimus may be higher than that of cyclosporine.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27653428/