PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Which tick treatment works best on dogs against European dog ticks

By Doyle, V et al.·Published in Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine·2005·C/O RBK House·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparative efficacy of the combination fipronil-(S)-methoprene and the combination permethrin-imidacloprid against Dermacentor reticulatus, the European dog tick, applied topically to dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Eighteen healthy beagle dogs were tested to see which tick prevention treatment worked better: fipronil-(S)-methoprene or imidacloprid-permethrin. After applying the treatments, both groups of dogs had significantly fewer ticks compared to untreated dogs, but those treated with fipronil-(S)-methoprene had much better results. This treatment kept tick counts at nearly 100% effectiveness for over a month, while the imidacloprid-permethrin treatment effectiveness dropped significantly after just a couple of weeks. If you're looking for a reliable tick prevention option for your dog, fipronil-(S)-methoprene may be the better choice.

People also search for: dog tick prevention · fipronil for dogs · imidacloprid-permethrin effectiveness

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of two of the most widely veterinary-dispensed topical products for control of ticks on dogs: fipronil-(S)-methoprene and imidacloprid-permethrin. Eighteen healthy beagle dogs of both sexes were divided into three groups of six dogs. Group 1 served as the untreated control. Dogs in group 2 were treated with fipronil 10% + (S)-methoprene 9% w/v applied once on day 0, and those in group 3 were treated with imidacloprid 8.8% and permethrin 44% w/v, applied once on day 0. All dogs were infested with approximately 50 unfed Dermacentor reticulatus ticks on days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42, and ticks remaining were counted and removed 48 hours after each infestation. The 48-hour efficacy of the fipronil-(S)-methoprene combination remained at 100% at all assessment points through and including day 37, declining to 95.30% on day 44. The 48-hour efficacy of the imidacloprid-permethrin combination peaked at 86.46% on day 9, decreased to 73.37% by the third week, and fell to 63.53% by the end of the study (day 44). Significantly (P < .05) fewer ticks were recovered from dogs treated with fipronil-(S)-methoprene or imidacloprid-permethrin than from untreated control dogs at each infestation. Notably, the dogs treated with fipronil-(S)-methoprene had significantly (P < .05) lower tick counts at every assessment than the dogs treated with imidacloprid-permethrin.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16550492/