Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How fast Simparica and NexGard kill lone star ticks on dogs
By Six, Robert H et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2016·Zoetis, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparative speed of kill of sarolaner (Simparica) and afoxolaner (NexGard) against induced infestations of Amblyomma americanum on dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs was treated with either Simparica (sarolaner) or NexGard (afoxolaner) to see which worked better against lone star ticks. The results showed that Simparica killed 100% of the ticks within 24 hours and continued to be effective against new tick infestations for up to 28 days. In contrast, NexGard's effectiveness dropped below 90% after just two weeks. Both treatments were safe, with no adverse reactions reported. This suggests that Simparica may be a more reliable option for protecting dogs from tick-borne diseases.
People also search for: dog tick prevention Simparica · NexGard effectiveness · lone star tick treatment for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, infests dogs and cats in North America and is the vector of the pathogens that cause monocytic and granulocytic ehrlichiosis in dogs and humans. A parasiticide's speed of kill is important to minimize the direct and deleterious effects of tick infestation and especially to reduce the risk of transmission of tick-borne pathogens. In this study, speed of kill of a novel orally administered isoxazoline parasiticide, sarolaner (Simparica chewable tablets), against A. americanum on dogs was evaluated and compared with afoxolaner (NexGard) for 5 weeks following a single oral dose. METHODS: Based on pretreatment tick counts, 24 dogs were randomly allocated to treatment with sarolaner (2 to 4 mg/kg), afoxolaner (2.5 to 6.8 mg/kg) or a placebo. Dogs were examined and live ticks counted at 8, 12, and 24 h after treatment and subsequent re-infestations on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. Efficacy was determined at each time point relative to counts for placebo dogs. RESULTS: A single oral dose of sarolaner provided 100 % efficacy within 24 h of treatment, and consistently provided >90% efficacy against subsequent weekly re-infestations with ticks to Day 28. Significantly more live ticks were recovered from afoxolaner-treated dogs than from sarolaner-treated dogs at 24 h after infestation from Day 7 through Day 35 (P ≤ 0.0247). At 24 h, efficacy of afoxolaner declined to less than 90% from Day 14 to the end of the study. There were no adverse reactions to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this controlled laboratory evaluation, sarolaner had a faster speed of kill against A. americanum ticks than afoxolaner. The rapid and consistent kill of ticks by sarolaner within 24 h after a single oral dose over 28 days, suggests this treatment will provide highly effective and reliable control of ticks over the entire treatment interval, and could help reduce the risk of transmission of tick-borne pathogens by A. americanum.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26897175/