Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Treatment options compared for dogs with acute hemorrhagic diarrhea
By Reisinger, Andrea et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2024·Ludwig Maximilian University, Germany·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparing treatment effects on dogs with acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome: fecal microbiota transplantation, symptomatic therapy, or antibiotic treatment.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 32 dogs with acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome (AHDS) were treated with either fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), antibiotics, or symptomatic therapy to see which helped them recover faster. While all treatments showed some improvement, none were significantly better than the others. Interestingly, the antibiotic treatment group had a higher severity of symptoms on the second day compared to the FMT group. Ultimately, the study found that the changes in harmful bacteria were temporary, and dogs generally improved without needing antibiotics.
People also search for: dog diarrhea treatment · fecal microbiota transplantation for dogs · antibiotics for dog diarrhea · acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Dogs with acute hemorrhagic diarrhea syndrome (AHDS) present with similar clinical signs and histopathological findings as dogs with parvovirosis, in which fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has led to a significantly faster resolution of diarrhea and shorter hospitalization times. We investigated whether FMT results in faster clinical improvement and normalization of the intestinal microbiome compared to standard treatment. ANIMALS: 32 client-owned dogs with AHDS. METHODS: A prospective, double-anonymized clinical trial included 3 groups: symptomatic treatment (n = 12), FMT treatment (FMTT; 12), and antibiotic treatment (AT; 8). Clinical improvement was determined on the basis of AHDS index, changes in the microbiome based on the dysbiosis index, and PCR results for clostridial strains. RESULTS: Overall, no significant differences in clinical scores between the treatment groups over time were detected except on day 2 (higher AHDS index in the AT group compared to FMTT group; P = .046). The dysbiosis index increased and P hiranonis decreased on day 1 in some dogs, but these changes were transient in the symptomatic treatment and FMTT groups. In the AT group, the dysbiosis index was persistently elevated and 4 of 8 dogs showed a reduced abundance of P hiranonis on day 42. In 67% of the dogs on day 1, NetF-encoding Clostridium perfringens was detected and enterotoxin-encoding strains increased, but these changes were transient in all dogs, regardless of therapy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Overall, in dogs with AHDS, neither FMT nor AT resulted in faster clinical improvement. In addition, C perfringens strains are self-limiting and do not require antibiotic therapy.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39094622/