Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparison between point-of-care dermatophyte test medium and mycology laboratory culture for diagnosis of dermatophytosis in dogs and cats.
- Journal:
- Veterinary dermatology
- Year:
- 2016
- Authors:
- Kaufmann, Ronnie et al.
- Affiliation:
- Dermatology Department
Plain-English summary
A study looked at a quick test called Point-of-Care Dermatophyte Test Medium (PoC-DTM) to see how well it works for diagnosing a skin infection called dermatophytosis in dogs and cats, compared to a more thorough lab test. They collected hair samples from 47 cats and 54 dogs that might have this infection, as well as samples from nine healthy pets. The results showed that when veterinarians examined the test results closely, the PoC-DTM was very accurate, with only a 3% chance of getting it wrong. However, when the results were only checked for color change without a detailed look, the chance of misdiagnosis increased to nearly 20%. Overall, the study suggests that a careful examination of the test results is important for accurate diagnosis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Point-of-care Dermatophyte Test Medium (PoC-DTM) is a diagnostic procedure to rule in/rule out dermatophytosis in veterinary clinics. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of PoC-DTM in the clinic compared to DTM plate culture in a mycology laboratory and to compare results obtained by general practitioners and referral clinicians. ANIMALS: Hair samples were collected from 47 cats and 54 dogs with suspected dermatophytosis and from nine healthy controls (seven cats and two dogs). METHODS: This was a multicentre blinded study. In one group (65 suspected cases, 9 healthy controls), PoC-DTM results were evaluated by clinicians in a referral clinic (SP group) who examined the colony morphology macroscopically and microscopically. In the other group (36 suspected cases) PoC-DTM results were evaluated by clinicians from general practice for colour change only, with no macroscopic or microscopic examination (GP group). All hair samples were also cultured on DTM plates in a mycology laboratory. Laboratory culture was considered the gold standard for comparison. RESULTS: Agreements between tests were 97% (two false positive; κ = 0.839) and 80.6% (five false positives and two false negatives; κ = 0.466) in the SP and GP groups, respectively. This difference between groups was significant (P = 0.024). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: When applying macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of the colony, PoC-DTM is accurate for diagnosing dermatophytes with only a 3% chance of error. However, when macroscopic and microscopic examination is not included there is significant (19.4%) chance for an incorrect diagnosis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27237544/