PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How two scans find liver shunts in dogs compared to surgery

By Sura, Patricia A et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2007·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of 99mTcO4(-) trans-splenic portal scintigraphy with per-rectal portal scintigraphy for diagnosis of portosystemic shunts in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs suspected of having congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS), a condition where blood bypasses the liver, underwent two different imaging tests to see which was better at finding the problem. The first test, trans-splenic portal scintigraphy (TSPS), was found to be more effective than the second test, per-rectal portal scintigraphy (PRPS), in detecting the number and location of shunts. TSPS was 100% accurate and required less radioactive material, making it safer for the dogs. This method helps veterinarians plan surgeries more effectively, leading to better outcomes for pets with CPSS.

People also search for: dog portosystemic shunt diagnosis · CPSS imaging tests for dogs · congenital liver shunt treatment

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trans-splenic portal scintigraphy (TSPS) and per-rectal portal scintigraphy (PRPS) for diagnosis of congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS) in dogs, and compare these results with surgical findings. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized cross over clinical trial. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=42) with suspected CPSS. METHODS: Dogs had TSPS and PRPS 48 hours apart; quantity of radionuclide administered was recorded. Three independent, blinded reviewers evaluated each scintigraphic study for study quality, shunt presence, number, and location of shunt termination (caudal vena cava, azygos vein). All dogs had exploratory celiotomy. Negative scintigraphic findings were confirmed with intraoperative mesenteric portography. Ameroid constrictors were placed on all extrahepatic CPSS, and hepatic biopsies were obtained. RESULTS: TSPS was 100% sensitive and specific for diagnosis of CPSS and significantly (P<.05) more likely than PRPS to detect shunt number and termination. Interpretation was consistent between observers, and TSPS required significantly less radionuclide than PRPS. CONCLUSION: TSPS was as sensitive as PRPS for detection of shunting vessels, and consistently yielded studies of higher quality, allowing detection of shunt number and location with consistent interpretation among radiologists. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TSPS provides information about shunt number and location, which allows improved surgical planning. Because it requires significantly less radionuclide, TSPS improves safety, allows for more comprehensive patient care, and earlier surgical intervention.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17894591/