PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Blind versus ultrasound-guided eye anesthesia in dogs having eye

By Briley, Jessica D et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2024·Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of a blind and an ultrasound-guided technique for Retrobulbar anesthesia in dogs undergoing unilateral subconjunctival enucleation.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 21 dogs undergoing eye removal surgery (unilateral enucleation) were given either a blind or an ultrasound-guided method for anesthesia. The dogs that received the ultrasound-guided technique needed significantly less pain medication during the surgery compared to those who had the blind method. While both groups had similar pain management after the surgery, the ultrasound-guided approach was found to be more effective in reducing the need for additional pain relief during the procedure. This suggests that using ultrasound guidance can improve comfort for dogs during eye surgeries.

People also search for: dog eye surgery anesthesia · enucleation pain management for dogs · ultrasound-guided anesthesia in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the quality of retrobulbar anesthesia using a blind inferior-temporal palpebral approach (ITP) with an ultrasound-guided supratemporal (ST) technique in dogs undergoing unilateral enucleation. ANIMAL STUDIED: Twenty-one client-owned dogs were undergoing enucleation. PROCEDURES: Dogs were randomly assigned to receive ITP (n =&#x2009;10) or ST (n =&#x2009;11) with 0.5% ropivacaine at 0.1 mL/cm of neurocranial length. The anesthetist was blinded to the technique. Intraoperative data included cardiopulmonary variables, inhalant anesthetics requirement, and requirement for rescue analgesia (intravenous fentanyl 2.5 mcg/kg). Postoperative data included pain scores, sedation scores, and need for intravenous hydromorphone (0.05 mg/kg). Treatments were compared using Wilcoxon's rank sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Comparison of variables over time were tested using a mixed effect linear model on rank. Significance was set at p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.05. RESULTS: Intraoperative cardiopulmonary variables and inhalant requirements were not different between groups. Dogs receiving ITP required median (interquartile range, IQR) 1.25 (0, 2.5) mcg/kg intraoperative fentanyl while those receiving ST required none (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01). Intraoperative fentanyl was required in 5/10 and 0/11 of dogs in the ITP and ST groups, respectively (p =&#x2009;0.01). Postoperative analgesia requirements were not significantly different between groups; 2/10 and 1/10 dogs in the ITP and ST groups, respectively. Sedation score negatively affected pain score (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound-guided ST technique was more effective at decreasing intraoperative opioid requirements than the blind ITP approach in dogs undergoing unilateral enucleation.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37021439/