Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Low carb low fiber vs moderate carb high fiber diets for diabetic cats
By Bennett, Nicole et al.·Published in Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery·2006·Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA, United States·View original on Crossref →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of a low carbohydrate–low fiber diet and a moderate carbohydrate–high fiber diet in the management of feline diabetes mellitus
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 63 diabetic cats was fed either a low carbohydrate–low fiber (LC–LF) diet or a moderate carbohydrate–high fiber (MC–HF) diet for 16 weeks to see which helped better with their diabetes management. By the end of the study, 68% of the cats on the LC–LF diet were able to stop needing insulin, compared to only 41% of those on the MC–HF diet. Both diets helped lower blood sugar levels, but the LC–LF diet was more effective in helping cats regain normal insulin function. This suggests that a low carbohydrate diet might be a better option for managing diabetes in cats.
People also search for: diabetic cat diet · low carbohydrate food for cats · how to manage cat diabetes without insulin
Abstract
This study compared the effects of a moderate carbohydrate–high fiber (MC–HF) food and a low carbohydrate–low fiber (LC–LF) food on glycemic control in cats with diabetes mellitus. Sixty-three diabetic cats (48 male castrated, 15 female spayed) were randomly assigned to be fed either a canned MC–HF ( n=32) food or a canned LC–LF ( n=31) food for 16 weeks. Owners were blinded to the type of diet fed. CBC, urinalysis, serum chemistry panel, fructosamine concentration and thyroxine concentration were determined on initial examination, and a complete blood count, serum chemistry panel, urinalysis and serum fructosamine concentration were repeated every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Insulin doses were adjusted as needed to resolve clinical signs and lower serum fructosamine concentrations. Serum glucose ( P=0.0001) and fructosamine ( P=0.0001) concentrations significantly decreased from week 0 to week 16 in both dietary groups. By week 16, significantly more of the cats fed the LC–LF food (68%, 22/31), compared to the cats fed the MC–HF food (41%, 13/32), had reverted to a non-insulin-dependent state ( P=0.03). Cats in both groups were successfully taken off of insulin regardless of age, sex, type of insulin administered or duration of clinical disease before entering the study. There was no significant difference in the initial or final mean body weights or in the mean change in body weight from week 0 to week 16 between dietary groups. Diabetic cats in this study were significantly more likely to revert to a non-insulin-dependent state when fed the canned LC–LF food versus the MC–HF food.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2005.08.004