PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How vegetable-based dental chews compare to others for dog oral health

By Gawor, Jerzy et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary dentistry·2021·Klinika Weterynaryjna Arka·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of a Vegetable-Based Dental Chew to 2 Other Chews for Oral Health Prevention.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that a vegetable-based dental chew helped reduce plaque and tartar in dogs, just like two other types of dental chews. Small and larger dogs were given either the vegetable chew or one of the reference chews daily for 30 days after their teeth were cleaned. All three types of chews were effective, but the vegetable chew showed a greater improvement in reducing gum bleeding. This means that using the vegetable chew can be a good option for keeping your dog's teeth and gums healthy at home.

People also search for: dog dental chews effectiveness · vegetable dental chew for dogs · how to prevent dog gum disease

Abstract

Giving dental chews to dogs is part of the passive homecare that helps prevent the formation of plaque and tartar. The objectives of these studies were to assess the effectiveness of a vegetable-based dental chew (VF) to maintain oral health, and to compare it to 2 different reference chews (RC) with a proven effectiveness. The first study was conducted on 45 small dogs (<10&#x2005;kg) and the second on 60 larger dogs (15-30&#x2005;kg) who were randomly assigned to 3 different groups. During 30 days, one group received no chew (control) while the second and third group received either one RC (RC1 or RC2) or one VF per day. All dogs had their teeth scaled on Day 0. On Day 30, scores were given for plaque and calculus. Gingival parameters were also assessed. Statistical analysis (analysis of variance and Tukey tests&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;Bonferroni's adjustment) were performed to compare groups withset at .05 for significance.The 3 types of chews were found to be efficacious to reduce plaque and calculus formation and the gingival bleeding compared to control (&#x2009;<&#x2009;.05). There was no significant difference between RCs and VF in both trials except for the gingival bleeding parameters which showed a greater improvement with VF. Therefore, daily administration of the VF is effective to reduce plaque and calculus formation and gingival bleeding and has a better efficacy on gingival bleeding than the other reference products tested. It can therefore be used with confidence at home for preventative dental care.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34784262/