PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing acid and heat treatment to detect heartworm in dogs

By Starkey, L A et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2020·Department of Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of acid- versus heat-treatment for immune complex dissociation and detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in canine plasma.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that dogs infected with heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) often test negative for the infection due to the presence of immune complexes in their blood. Researchers compared two methods for breaking these complexes apart: using acid or heat. They tested plasma from 24 infected dogs and found that 75% tested positive for heartworm after acid treatment, while 79% tested positive after heat treatment. Importantly, neither method caused false positives in 75 non-infected dogs. This suggests that using acid can be an effective way to detect heartworm infection without misleading results in healthy dogs.

People also search for: dog heartworm test false negative · heartworm treatment for dogs · how to test for heartworm in dogs

Abstract

Annual antigen testing is a mainstay for diagnosing infection with Dirofiliaria immitis in dogs; yet, it has been documented that some heartworm-infected dogs and cats test false-negative for antigen due to the presence of antigen-antibody complexes. Several studies have reported the use of heat as a reliable means of immune-complex dissociation (ICD) in recent years; however, the data regarding the use of acid as a reliable method of ICD for D. immitis detection are limited. The objective of this study was to compare an acid-based form of ICD to the more established and evaluated method of heat-based ICD in experimentally infected and non-infected dogs. Plasma from class A dogs experimentally infected ∼4 months prior with D. immitis (infected; n = 24) and dogs reared indoors with no history of exposure to mosquitoes (non-infected; n = 75) were evaluated for presence of D. immitis antigen (DiroCHEK® Heartworm antigen test kit). Each sample was divided into three aliquots for testing: [1] Control plasma (no acid- or heat-treatment), [2] acid-treated plasma (trichloroacetic acid (TCA), incubation, centrifugation for 5 min at 16,000 X g, buffer), and [3] heat-treated plasma (104 °C followed by centrifugation at 16,000 X g). Treatments for each aliquot were performed and tested in triplicate; results were determined both visually (color change) and by spectrophotometric analysis (optical density [OD] value). Of the 24 infected dogs, 0/24 tested positive for antigen in the absence of acid- or heat-treatment. Those same plasma samples following processing by either acid- or heat-treatment yielded 18/24 (75.0%) and 19/24 (79.2%) antigen-positive results, respectively. Of the 75 plasma samples from non-infected dogs, neither acid- nor heat-treatment of plasma caused any false-positive color changes or spectrophotometric values. These results indicate that acid as a means of ICD reliably allowed for the detection of D. immitis antigen in infected plasma while not inducing false-positive results in non-infected plasma samples.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474295/