Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Aspiration vs nonaspiration for spleen samples in dogs and cats
By Leblanc, Casey J et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2009·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of aspiration and nonaspiration techniques for obtaining cytologic samples from the canine and feline spleen.
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs and cats undergoing abdominal ultrasounds had samples taken from their spleens to check for health issues. Researchers compared two methods: one that used suction (aspiration) and another that did not (nonaspiration). They found that the nonaspiration method provided better quality samples with more cells and less blood, while still keeping the cell structure intact. This suggests that using the nonaspiration technique is a better choice for getting spleen samples in pets.
People also search for: dog spleen biopsy method · cat spleen health check · aspiration vs nonaspiration cytology in pets
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the spleen is commonly used in the diagnostic evaluation of veterinary patients. Techniques using suction delivered through a 6-20-cm(3) syringe are the most commonly described means of obtaining cytologic samples of the spleen. Comparison studies of various human lesions have shown nonaspiration techniques to produce equal or superior cytologic specimens with less blood than specimens obtained using aspiration techniques. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of splenic cytology specimens obtained using aspiration and nonaspiration techniques. METHODS: Client-owned dogs (n=24) and cats (n=7) receiving an abdominal ultrasound at the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine were enrolled in the study between January and June 2005. Samples were obtained from patients with and without sonographic splenic abnormalities. Two clinical pathologists, working independently and blinded to the method of sample collection, graded the cytologic specimens using a subjective scoring system for cellularity, amount of blood, and preservation of cellular morphology. RESULTS: Agreement between the 2 independent observers was good. Direct comparison of the 2 techniques showed that samples obtained by the nonaspiration method had higher cellularity (P=.0002), less blood (P=.0023), and similar cell morphology (P=1.0000) compared with samples obtained by the aspiration method. CONCLUSION: These results suggest the nonaspiration technique is a superior method for obtaining a high-quality cytologic specimen from the canine and feline spleen.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19351344/