Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog cataract surgery lens types compared for cloudiness and vision
By Gift, Barrett W et al.Ā·Published in Veterinary ophthalmologyĀ·2009Ā·Animal Eye Care Associates, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Comparison of capsular opacification and refractive status after placement of three different intraocular lens implants following phacoemulsification and aspiration of cataracts in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 60 dogs with cataracts underwent surgery to replace their cloudy lenses with new intraocular lenses (IOLs). One eye received a rounded edge PMMA lens, while the other eye received either a squared edge hydrophilic or hydrophobic acrylic lens. After about 79 days, the dogs were examined, and it was found that the hydrophilic acrylic lens had less posterior capsular opacification (PCO) compared to the PMMA lens, meaning it stayed clearer longer. However, the PMMA lens provided better vision correction than the acrylic lenses.
People also search for: dog cataract surgery recovery Ā· best lens for dog cataracts Ā· dog eye surgery complications
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of lens design and biomaterial on formation of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and refractive correction. Animals studied Sixty dogs undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification for mature or diabetic cataracts. PROCEDURES: One randomly selected eye received a rounded edge 41D polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) intraocular replacement lens (IOL) and the contralateral eye received either a squared edge 41D hydrophilic acrylic IOL (n = 35) or a squared edge 40D hydrophobic acrylic IOL (n = 25). At the (mean = 79 day) reexamination period, PCO was graded using direct slit-lamp observation and by masked observer evaluation of digital images of the IOLs. Streak retinoscopy and B-mode ultrasound were performed at this period. RESULTS: The PCO score via direct slit-lamp was significantly lower for the hydrophilic acrylic IOL when compared to the PMMA IOL. Masked observer evaluation of digital images revealed that the acrylic IOLs had lower but generally not statistically significant PCO scores than the PMMA IOLs. Streak retinoscopy showed that the PMMA IOL was significantly closer to emmetropia (+0.44 D) when compared to either the hydrophilic acrylic (+0.96 D) or the hydrophobic acrylic (+1.2 D) IOLs. B-mode ultrasonography revealed the center of the hydrophilic acrylic IOL is 0.31 mm closer to the retina and the center of the hydrophobic acrylic IOL is 0.63 mm further from the retina when compared to the center of the PMMA to retina distance. CONCLUSIONS: Square edged foldable acrylic IOLs show a predisposition towards generating slightly less PCO than round edged PMMA IOLs in the early postoperative period, however, both acrylic IOLs had greater persistent hyperopia than the PMMA IOLs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19152593/