Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Lab test differences in dogs after cannabis exposure compared
By Pereira, Helder Camilo da Silva et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2025·Department of Veterinary Science, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of clinicopathologic findings and urine drug screen results in cannabis-positive and control dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of nine dogs was brought to an emergency clinic in Brazil after their owners suspected they had eaten cannabis. The dogs showed only mild symptoms, and tests for THC (the active ingredient in cannabis) confirmed exposure, but there were no significant changes in their blood or urine tests. The dogs were treated supportively, and fortunately, they all seemed to recover well with minimal effects from the cannabis. This suggests that while cannabis ingestion can happen, it often leads to mild reactions rather than severe toxicity.
People also search for: dog cannabis ingestion symptoms · what to do if my dog ate marijuana · THC test for dogs · cannabis toxicity in dogs treatment
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cannabis intoxication is increasingly reported in small animal practice, often resulting from accidental ingestion of human products or unsupervised access to the plant. Although clinical signs are well documented, laboratory alterations remain poorly described. This study aimed to confirm cannabis intoxication in dogs using a rapid urinary test for THC metabolites and to investigate associated hematological, biochemical, and urinary alterations. METHODS: In this study, nine dogs that were admitted to the emergency veterinary clinic in João Pessoa, Brazil, between 2021 and 2022, with suspected cannabis ingestion and owner confirmation, were evaluated. The animals were included regardless of breed, sex or age, and the results compared with healthy animals (control). Clinical signs were treated supportively. Urine and blood samples were collected 6 h after admission. Dogs were classified as "positive" or "negative/control" based on chromatographic detection of THC metabolites (PoCT COC/THC Assure Tech, Westlake Eco Zone/China; ANVISA 80885650015). Hematological analysis evaluated anemia, leukocyte, and platelet counts; serum biochemistry focused on hepatic and renal markers; urinalysis assessed color, clarity, specific gravity, and pH. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between intoxicated and non-intoxicated dogs in any of the laboratory parameters. Additionally, most animals showed only discrete or absent clinical signs. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that accidental cannabis ingestion in dogs tends to result in mild physiological effects and minimal laboratory alterations, indicating a low risk of severe toxicity. Nonetheless, accurate identification of exposure using diagnostic tools is essential for appropriate case management. A deeper understanding of the endocannabinoid system in companion animals is key to improving clinical decision-making and assessing potential risks associated with cannabis exposure.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41445591/