PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Comparing two glaucoma surgeries for dogs and their outcomes

By Graham, Kathleen L et al.·Published in Veterinary ophthalmology·2018·Sydney Medical School, Australia·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of diode laser trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation versus implantation of a 350-mmBaerveldt glaucoma drainage device for the treatment of glaucoma in dogs (a retrospective study: 2010-2016).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with glaucoma underwent two different surgical treatments to see which was more effective at controlling eye pressure and preserving vision. One group had a procedure called trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP), while another group received a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device (GDD). The results showed that the GDD was better at keeping eye pressure down and maintaining vision compared to TSCP. Most dogs with the GDD had good results for about 11 months, while those with TSCP had results for about 16 months but with less success in vision retention.

People also search for: dog glaucoma treatment · Baerveldt drainage device for dogs · TSCP glaucoma surgery for dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes following trans-scleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP) and 350-mmBaerveldt implantation in the treatment of canine refractory glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective case study. CASE SELECTION: Client owned dogs undergoing surgical treatment of glaucoma within a veterinary referral hospital. PROCEDURES: Eighty-six glaucoma surgeries were performed on 83 eyes (69 dogs) diagnosed with primary or secondary glaucoma. Medical records were retrieved, and baseline data, surgery, medications, intraocular pressures (IOPs), vision, and complications were extracted. RESULTS: Fifty-four eyes (44 dogs) were treated with TSCP and placement of an anterior chamber suture shunt; 28 eyes (24 dogs) were implanted with a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device (GDD); and four eyes (4 dogs) underwent GDD implantation after failure of TSCP to manage IOP. Following TSCP, IOP control (<20 mmHg) and vision retention occurred in 81.5% and 42.6%, respectively, for 16.1 &#xb1; 1.36 months. Following GDD implantation, 71.4% maintained IOP <20 mmHg and 69.6% maintained vision for 11.0 &#xb1; 0.94 months. IOP control without loss of vision was more likely following Baerveldt implantation (17/28; 60.7%) than TSCP (19/54; 35.2%) (P = 0.027). One eye had functional vision restored following GDD placement. IOP control without adjunctive medications was more likely following Baerveldt implantation (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, eyes treated with Baerveldt GDD implantation were more likely to maintain IOP control and retain vision compared to eyes treated with TSCP and placement of an anterior chamber suture shunt. Lack of formal randomization, inconsistencies in surgical techniques and TSCP protocols, and potential unmeasured confounders must be considered when extrapolating from this retrospective study.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29383822/