PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How well dogs absorb glucosamine from liquid, chewable, and tablet

By Maxwell, Lara K et al.·Published in Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·2016·From Oklahoma State University·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of Glucosamine Absorption After Administration of Oral Liquid, Chewable, and Tablet Formulations to Dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs was given different types of glucosamine supplements—liquid, chewable, and tablets—to see how well each form was absorbed into their bodies. The results showed that the liquid form was absorbed better and faster than the tablet forms. Specifically, the liquid reached higher levels in the bloodstream more quickly than the tablets did. This means that if you're considering glucosamine for your dog’s joint health, a liquid supplement might be more effective than tablets.

People also search for: dog joint supplements · glucosamine liquid vs tablet for dogs · best glucosamine for dog arthritis

Abstract

Glucosamine (GS) is commonly administered as a nutritional supplement to support joint function. Although many supplements are available, the effect of formulation on oral absorption in dogs is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative bioavailability of GS for liquid, chewable, and tablet formulations containing GS sulfate or hydrochloride and chondroitin sulfate. In a randomized cross-over design, supplements were administered daily for 8 days with a 1 wk washout period between treatments. Liquid or Tablet A was administered to four dogs, whereas Liquid or Tablet B was administered to four additional dogs. When nutraceutical exposure was normalized to the administered dose of GS free base, similar relative bioavailabilities were determined for all three formulations. However, the dose-normalized maximum plasma GS concentration was higher for the liquid supplement (5.5 &#xb1; 0.5 &#x3bc;g/mL) than for the two tablets (3.1 &#xb1; 0.6 and 2.1 &#xb1; 0.6 &#x3bc;g/mL, P < 0.001). Similarly, the time at which maximal plasma GS concentrations occurred was shorter for the liquid formulation (0.7 &#xb1; 0.5 hr) than for the two tablets (4.2 &#xb1; 0.6 and 5.0 &#xb1; 0.6 hr, P < 0.001). These data show that the formulation of joint supplements affects the oral absorption of GS in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26808433/