Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog spinal surgery for disk extrusion using harmonic blade versus
By Hettlich, Bianca F et al.·Published in PloS one·2017·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of harmonic blade versus traditional approach in canine patients undergoing spinal decompressive surgery for naturally occurring thoracolumbar disk extrusion.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs with back problems caused by a slipped disk underwent spinal surgery using either a new harmonic blade or a traditional method. After the surgery, the dogs that had the harmonic blade showed less pain and better recovery of their movement compared to those that had the traditional approach. Both methods had minimal blood loss and similar surgery times, but the harmonic blade resulted in a more comfortable recovery for the dogs. Overall, the harmonic blade proved to be a safe and effective option for this type of surgery.
People also search for: dog back surgery recovery · slipped disk treatment in dogs · spinal surgery pain management for dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess feasibility of the harmonic Osteovue blade (HOB) for use in the soft tissue approach for dogs undergoing hemilaminectomy and to compare outcomes between dogs undergoing HOB or traditional approach (TRAD). METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed using 20 client-owned dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk extrusion requiring hemilaminectomy. Dogs were randomly assigned to HOB or TRAD. Neurologic function and pain scores were assessed pre-operatively. Intraoperative blood loss and surgical approach time as well as postoperative pain and wound healing scores were recorded. Additionally, neurologic recovery and owner perceived quality of life were recorded at day 10 and 30 postoperative. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in sex distribution, weight, age, preoperative neurological grade and pain score, and perioperative outcome measures between groups. Intraoperative total blood loss was minimal for HOB and TRAD (median: 0 ml (range 0-9) and 2.2 ml (range 0-6.8), respectively; p = 0.165) and approach times were similar (median: 7 min (range 5-12) and 8 min (range 5-13), respectively; p = 0.315). While changes in wound healing scores were similar, changes in postoperative pain scores and neurological function were significantly improved in the HOB compared to the TRAD group. Postoperative complications in the HOB group consisted of automutilation of part of the incision and development of a small soft, non-painful subcutaneous swelling in 1 dog each. CONCLUSIONS: The HOB is a safe and effective tool for the soft tissue approach for routine spinal surgery in dogs and is associated with decreased pain and increased neurological function post-surgery.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28253289/