Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in awake cats
By Martel, Eric et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2013·1Centre de Recherches Biologiques (CERB), France·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of high-definition oscillometry -- a non-invasive technology for arterial blood pressure measurement -- with a direct invasive method using radio-telemetry in awake healthy cats.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of six healthy cats had their blood pressure measured using a new non-invasive method called high-definition oscillometry (HDO) and compared it to a direct method using a radio-telemetry device. The study found that HDO provided reliable systolic blood pressure readings, closely matching the direct method, but tended to underestimate diastolic blood pressure. While HDO is validated for use in cats, the results showed it might not be as accurate for diastolic measurements compared to dogs. Overall, HDO is considered a trustworthy option for measuring blood pressure in conscious cats.
People also search for: cat blood pressure measurement · non-invasive blood pressure cats · high-definition oscillometry cats
Abstract
This study compared indirect blood pressure measurements using a non-invasive method, high-definition oscillometry (HDO), with direct measurements using a radio-telemetry device in awake cats. Paired measurements partitioned to five sub-ranges were collected in six cats using both methods. The results were analysed for assessment of correlation and agreement between the two methods, taking into account all pressure ranges, and with data separated in three sub-groups, low, normal and high ranges of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure. SBP data displayed a mean correlation coefficient of 0.92 ± 0.02 that was reduced for low SBP. The agreement level evaluated from the whole data set was high and slightly reduced for low SBP values. The mean correlation coefficient of DBP was lower than for SBP (ie, 0.81 ± 0.02). The bias for DBP between the two methods was 22.3 ± 1.6 mmHg, suggesting that HDO produced lower values than telemetry. These results suggest that HDO met the validation criteria defined by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus panel and provided a faithful measurement of SBP in conscious cats. For DBP, results suggest that HDO tended to underestimate DBP. This finding is clearly inconsistent with the good agreement reported in dogs, but is similar to outcomes achieved in marmosets and cynomolgus monkeys, suggesting that this is not related to HDO but is species related. The data support that the HDO is the first and only validated non-invasive blood pressure device and, as such, it is the only non-invasive reference technique that should be used in future validation studies.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23813147/