Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How well conscious cats tolerate blood pressure checks on leg vs tail
By Cannon, Martha J & Brett, Jo·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2012·Oxford Cat Clinic, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of how well conscious cats tolerate blood pressure measurement from the radial and coccygeal arteries.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 30 cats were tested for blood pressure using two different methods: one from the radial artery (in the front leg) and the other from the coccygeal artery (near the tail). The cats were more comfortable and tolerated the measurements better when taken from the coccygeal artery, leading to fewer failed attempts and quicker results. The blood pressure readings were slightly higher from the coccygeal artery, but overall, both methods provided useful information. This study suggests that using the coccygeal artery may be the best choice for measuring blood pressure in conscious cats.
People also search for: cat blood pressure measurement · how to measure cat blood pressure · why is my cat's blood pressure high
Abstract
Hypertension is a common condition of older cats and acquiring clinically relevant and repeatable blood pressure (BP) measurements in conscious cats is important in its diagnosis and management. The most common sites for indirect BP measurement in the cat are the radial artery (RA) and the coccygeal artery (CA) but, to date, there are no published data comparing how conscious cats tolerate BP measurements from these sites. A high-definition oscillometric BP monitor was used to measure BP in 30 cats admitted to a cat-only veterinary clinic for reasons other than hypertension. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) were measured using the RA and CA, alternating which site was used first. The number of failed attempts and total time to achieve six measurements was recorded. Measurement of BP using the CA was better tolerated than the RA, resulting in fewer failures and shorter total time required. SAP measurements were slightly higher from the CA compared with the RA, irrespective of which site was used first. There were no significant differences in MAP and DAP. The coccygeal artery appears to be the more appropriate site to use when measuring BP in conscious cats using this oscillometric machine. Further studies are required using alternative BP monitors, including Doppler machines, to establish whether this is a consistent finding. When measuring BP in cats the site used should be recorded and the same site used for all subsequent measurements from the same cat.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22832888/