Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Vitamin K1 IV treatment versus traditional therapy for rodenticide
By Agostini, G et al.·Published in Australian veterinary journal·2025·Queensland Veterinary Specialists, Australia·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of intravenous mixed micelle phytomenadione (vitamin K1) and traditional therapies for the treatment of anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis in dogs and cats: a retrospective study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 71 dogs and 3 cats were treated for poisoning after ingesting anticoagulant rodenticide, which can interfere with blood clotting. Some pets received a new treatment called mixed micelle phytomenadione (MMP), while others were treated with traditional blood products. The pets treated with MMP had shorter hospital stays and no adverse reactions, and both groups had similar survival rates. This suggests that MMP is a safe and effective alternative for treating this type of poisoning in pets.
People also search for: dog rodenticide poisoning treatment · cat anticoagulant rodenticide symptoms · vitamin K1 for dogs poisoning
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ingestion of anticoagulant rodenticide is among the most common toxicoses seen in dogs and cats. Current treatment protocols in veterinary patients recommend the use of plasma-containing blood products to replenish clotting factors. Intravenous mixed-micelle phytomenadione (MMP) represents a safe and cost-effective alternative to traditional therapy. OBJECTIVE: Description of the use of MMP as a treatment for clinical anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis, focusing on the incidence of adverse reactions and restoration of coagulation times. Duration of hospitalisation, cost of treatment and need for red blood cell-containing products were compared between two cohorts of patients receiving MMP and traditional therapy with blood products. METHODS: Retrospective search of electronic medical records from two Australian emergency and referral hospitals for patients treated for clinical anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis between July 2021 and July 2024. RESULTS: 74 animals (71 dogs, 3 cats) were treated for anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis within the study period. 44 dogs comprised the "control" group, and 27 dogs and 3 cats comprised the "MMP" group. One dog was excluded from each group. There was no difference in survival to discharge between groups (P = 0.28). No adverse reactions to MMP were recorded. Dogs within the "control" group were significantly more likely to receive fresh frozen plasma (FFP), there was no difference in requirement for red blood cell-containing products between groups (P = 1). Animals in the MMP group had significantly shorter hospitalisation time when compared with the control group (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Based on red cell transfusion requirements and survival data in this case series, it can be suggested that MMP is a comparable and cost-effective treatment alternative for clinical anticoagulant rodenticide toxicosis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40778568/