Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Comparing manual and automated blood tests for anemia in dogs
By Collicutt, Nancy B et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2012·Department of Population Health and Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of manual polychromatophilic cell and automated reticulocyte quantification in evaluating regenerative response in anemic dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of anemic dogs was evaluated to compare two methods for measuring how well their bodies were responding to anemia: counting polychromatophilic cells (a type of young red blood cell) on blood smears and using an automated machine to count reticulocytes (another type of young red blood cell). The study found that while both methods are useful, counting polychromatophilic cells is particularly effective when the reticulocyte count is high. For dogs with lower reticulocyte counts, the automated method provided more accurate results. This information can help veterinarians better assess and treat anemia in dogs.
People also search for: dog anemia treatment · how to tell if my dog is anemic · reticulocyte count in dogs · polychromatophilic cells in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Degree of polychromasia and reticulocyte counts are commonly used in veterinary medicine to evaluate response to anemia. The quantitative association between these 2 measurements has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare automated reticulocyte percents and counts with those of polychromatophilic cells on blood films from dogs. METHODS: Blood films and medical records from 30 clinically healthy dogs and 60 anemic dogs were evaluated. Manual percentage of polychromatophilic cells (MPP) was determined by counting cells in 10 1000× fields, and automated reticulocyte percentage (ARP) was measured using an ADVIA 120 hematology analyzer; absolute polychromatophilic cell and reticulocyte counts were then calculated. Degree of polychromasia, estimated as slight, mild, moderate, marked was documented. Percentages and absolute counts of polychromatophilic cells and reticulocytes were compared using least squares regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The reference interval for MPP in healthy dogs was 0.21-0.26%. Correlation between MPP and ARP was highest when all levels were considered (n = 60, r = .98, P < .0001), strong when ARP was > 5% (n = 20, r = .91, P < .0001), and poor when ARP was 1-2% (n = 20, r = .35, P < .0001). Results were similar for comparisons of absolute reticulocyte and polychromatophilic cell counts, with the best correlation found when all levels of counts were analyzed together (r = .96) and for automated reticulocyte counts > 150,000/μL (r = .94). Correlation of estimates of polychromasia with ARP was good (r = .83). CONCLUSION: In anemic dogs MPP can be used for assessment of regeneration, especially in dogs with higher levels of ARP. Standard quantification of reticulocytes is more accurate in dogs with lesser degrees of regeneration.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22671286/