PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Detecting ureteral stones in cats with CT versus ultrasound

By Testault, Isabelle et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2021·Centre Hospitalier V&#xe9, France·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of nonenhanced computed tomography and ultrasonography for detection of ureteral calculi in cats: A prospective study.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 51 cats with ureteral stones (calculi) underwent both ultrasound and nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) to see which method was better at finding the stones. The CT detected significantly more stones (126) compared to ultrasound (90), and it also identified more affected ureters. This suggests that using CT can be very helpful for diagnosing ureteral obstructions in cats. Combining both imaging techniques can improve how veterinarians manage these cases.

People also search for: cat ureteral stones treatment · ultrasound vs CT for cat kidney stones · how to treat cat urinary blockage

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiographs and ultrasound (US) are the primary imaging modalities used to assess ureteral calculi in cats. Reports describing the use of nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) are scarce. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To compare US and nonenhanced CT for detection, number and localization of ureteral calculi in cats. ANIMALS: Fifty-one cats with at least 1 ureteral calculus, and 101 ureters. METHODS: Prospective case series. All cats underwent an US followed by a nonenhanced CT. Cats were included in the study if at least 1 ureteral calculus was diagnosed on either modality. Number of calculi and their localization (proximal, middle, and distal) were recorded on both modalities. Pelvic dilatation and maximal ureteral diameter were recorded with US. RESULTS: More calculi were detected by nonenhanced CT (126) compared to US (90), regardless of localization (P&#xa0;<&#x2009;.001). More ureters were affected on nonenhanced CT (70) compared to US (57; P&#xa0;<&#x2009;.001). The number of calculi detected was significantly different between US and nonenhanced CT in the proximal (P&#xa0;=&#x2009;.02) and distal ureteral region (P&#xa0;<&#x2009;.001). Bilateral calculi were more frequent with nonenhanced CT (19 cats) compared to US (9 cats; P&#xa0;<&#x2009;.001). A pelvic size superior to 5&#x2009;mm and a maximal ureteral diameter value superior to 3&#x2009;mm were always associated with ureteral calculi. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Computed tomography is an emerging imaging modality in cats with a suspected ureteral obstruction. Combination of CT and US can be beneficial for case management.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34258789/