Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Outcomes of medical vs surgical treatment for prostate cancer in dogs
By Iizuka, Keigo et al.·Published in BMC veterinary research·2022·Department of Veterinary Medicine, Japan·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of outcomes between medical and surgical treatment in dogs with prostatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A 10-year-old mixed breed dog was diagnosed with prostatic adenocarcinoma (a type of prostate cancer) and had been experiencing symptoms related to the condition. The dog was treated with either surgery or medication, and the results showed that dogs who underwent surgery had a significantly longer survival time compared to those who received only medical treatment. Specifically, dogs that had a total prostatectomy (removal of the prostate) lived an average of 510 days after surgery, while those who had a different surgical procedure faced more complications and shorter survival. This suggests that surgery can greatly improve the quality of life and longevity for dogs with this type of cancer, especially if detected early.
People also search for: dog prostate cancer treatment · prostatic adenocarcinoma surgery · dog urinary incontinence after surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostatic cancer is uncommon in dogs. Dogs with prostatic carcinoma have been reported to have a poor prognosis. Information regarding prognosis with various surgery options as well as prognosis with surgical vs. medical treatment is lacking. This retrospective study compares the outcomes of medical management to surgical treatment in dogs with prostatic adenocarcinoma and assesses the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent total prostatectomy (TP) and prostatocystectomy (TPC). The medical records of 41 dogs with prostatic adenocarcinoma, between February 2008 and June 2019, were reviewed for information on signalment, clinical signs in the initial evaluation, preoperative diagnostic imaging findings, treatment type (non-surgical or surgical), surgery type, postoperative complications, adjunctive medical therapy, and survival time. The dogs were divided into non-surgical (n = 12) or surgical (n = 29) groups. The surgical group was subdivided into the TP (n = 20) and TPC (n = 9) subgroups. RESULTS: Age was not significantly different between the surgical (median 13.1 years [8.4-15.4] years) and the non-surgical groups (median 10.8 [7.7-15.3] years). Body weight (BW) was also not significantly different between the surgical (median 6.8 kg [2.4-34.5 kg]) and non-surgical groups (median 6.4 kg [3.7-9.12 kg]). The overall median survival time (MST) from the initial evaluation was significantly longer in the surgical than in the non-surgical group (337 vs. 90.5 days). The postoperative MST was significantly longer in the TP group than in the TPC subgroup (510 vs. 83 days). As TPC was performed in cases of tumor progression, its postoperative complications were severe, resulting in a shorter MST. Ten (50%) and 6 patients (30%) in the TP subgroup postoperatively showed mild and severe urinary incontinence, respectively, whereas all patients in TPC subgroup did show severe incontinence. CONCLUSION: Results of the study suggest that surgical treatment of prostatic carcinoma results in longer survival times over medical management alone. In particular, TP might be recommended for improving survival time and quality of life in canine prostatic adenocarcinoma that does not infiltrate the bladder. Early detection is key for a survival advantage with surgical treatment.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35033065/