PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Skin graft success after tumor removal on dogs' lower legs

By Bonaventura, Nicole C & Ganjei, Justin B·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2021·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Comparison of outcomes for single-session and delayed full-thickness applications of meshed skin grafts used to close skin defects after excision of tumors on the distal aspects of the limbs in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 52 dogs that had tumors removed from their legs received skin grafts to help heal the area. Some dogs had the grafts placed in a single session, while others had them done in stages. Both methods worked well, with about 90% of the grafts surviving in the single-session group and 82% in the staged group. However, dogs with staged procedures took longer to heal, averaging 51 days compared to 29.5 days for those with single-session grafts. Overall, both methods were effective, but the single-session approach may be easier for pet owners due to fewer bandage changes and quicker healing.

People also search for: dog skin graft recovery time · tumor removal skin graft success rate · dog leg tumor treatment options

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after application of full-thickness, meshed free-skin grafts in single-session versus delayed (staged) procedures after tumor excision from the distal aspects of the limbs in dogs. ANIMALS: 52 client-owned dogs. PROCEDURES: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify dogs that received full-thickness, meshed free-skin grafts after tumor excision from the distal aspects of the limbs between 2013 and 2018. Signalment; diagnostic test results; comorbidities; procedure type (single session or staged); tumor characteristics; donor site, recipient site, and size of grafts; concurrent procedures; surgeon; antimicrobial administration; external coaptation type; number of bandage applications; percentage graft survival; graft outcome; postoperative complications; and time to complete healing were recorded. Graft outcome was deemed successful if there was full-thickness graft viability over ≥ 75% of the original graft area. Variables were compared between dogs grouped by procedure type. RESULTS: The number of bandage applications was significantly greater for dogs that had staged versus single-session procedures. Twenty-seven of 30 (90%) and 18 of 22 (82%) skin grafts placed in single-session and staged procedures, respectively, were successful. Percentage graft survival, graft outcome, and complication rate did not differ between groups. All complications were minor. Time to complete healing was significantly longer after staged procedures (median, 51 days) than after single-session procedures (29.5 days). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested both procedure types are appropriate for skin graft placement. The shorter healing time and fewer bandage changes associated with single-session skin graft placement may be beneficial after tumor excision. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33539210/