Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog hiatal hernia surgery outcomes with and without gastropexy
By Watkins, M et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2025·The Queen's Veterinary School Small Animal Hospital, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of outcomes in dogs undergoing hiatal hernia repair with and without use of a gastropexy: 41 cases (2012-2022).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 41 dogs with hiatal hernias underwent surgery to fix the issue, with some receiving an additional procedure called gastropexy (which helps prevent the stomach from moving into the chest). The study found that dogs who had the gastropexy were more likely to need further surgery or continued treatment for gastrointestinal problems compared to those who did not have the gastropexy. However, both groups showed significant improvement in their gastrointestinal symptoms after surgery. Overall, the surgery was successful without the need for the gastropexy, as long as the main procedures were performed.
People also search for: dog hiatal hernia surgery recovery · gastropexy for dogs · dog gastrointestinal problems after surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in complication rate, gastrointestinal grade and requirement for ongoing medical and/or surgical management following hiatal hernia repair in dogs with and without gastropexy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively for dogs that had undergone surgical hiatal hernia repair at two veterinary referral centres between April 2012 and March 2022. Pre-operative grading of gastrointestinal signs and brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome was performed. All dogs had an oesophagopexy and phrenoplasty. Referring primary veterinary practices and clients were contacted to obtain follow-up information. Fisher's exact tests and Mann Whitney tests were used to assess pre- and intra-operative similarities between groups. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to determine the changes in gastrointestinal grade at short- (<6 months) and long-term (>6 months) follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-one dogs which underwent oesophagopexy and phrenoplasty were included. Fifteen dogs had no gastropexy performed and 26 dogs had left-sided gastropexy performed. Dogs that underwent gastropexy (n=8, 29%, 95% CI: 13 to 51%) were significantly more likely to require further surgery related to the initial surgery or persistence of gastrointestinal signs compared to dogs that had no gastropexy (n=0, 0%, 95% CI: 0 to 18%) . This difference was not significant when dogs which had further surgery to address brachycephalic obstructive airway syndrome were excluded. Gastrointestinal grade significantly improved for both groups at both short- and long-term follow-up. There was no significant difference in overall complication rate, gastrointestinal grade or requirement for further medical treatment between groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A left-sided gastropexy is not required for successful surgical repair of hiatal hernia in dogs provided oesophagopexy and phrenoplasty are performed.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39444195/