Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Predicting early motor recovery in paraplegic dogs with disk
By Wang-Leandro, A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2017·Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Germany·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of Preoperative Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Assessment of Deep Pain Perception as Prognostic Tools for Early Recovery of Motor Function in Paraplegic Dogs with Intervertebral Disk Herniations.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 35 paraplegic dogs with back problems caused by intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH) were studied to see how well different tests could predict their recovery of movement after surgery. The tests included checking for deep pain perception (DPP) and using advanced MRI techniques to measure brain activity. It turned out that the DPP test was just as good at predicting recovery as the MRI, and even better at identifying which dogs would recover faster. This information can help vets choose the best treatment options for dogs with similar conditions.
People also search for: dog back surgery recovery · intervertebral disk herniation treatment · deep pain perception in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prognostic tools to predict early postoperative motor function recovery (MFR) after thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH) in paraplegic dogs represent an opportunity to timely implement novel therapies that could shorten recovery times and diminish permanent neurological dysfunctions. HYPOTHESIS: Fractional anisotropy (FA) values obtained using diffusion tensor imaging have a higher prognostic value than a lesion extension ratio in T2-weighted images (T2W-LER) and clinical assessment of deep pain perception (DPP) for MFR. ANIMALS: Thirty-five paraplegic dogs with diagnosis of acute or subacute thoracolumbar IVDH. METHODS: Prospective, descriptive observational study. At admission, absence or presence of DPP, T2W-LER, and FA values was evaluated. MFR was assessed within 4 weeks after decompressive surgery. Values of T2W-LER and FA of dogs with and without MFR were compared using t-tests. All 3 methods were evaluated for their sensitivity and specificity as a prognostic factor. RESULTS: No differences were found between groups regarding T2W-LER. FA values differed statistically when measured caudally of lesion epicenter being higher in dogs without MFR compared to dogs with MFR (P = .023). Logistic regression analysis revealed significance in FA values measured caudally of the lesion epicenter (P = .033, area under the curve = 0.72). Using a cutoff value of FA = 0.660, the technique had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 55%. Evaluation of DPP had a sensitivity of 73.3% and specificity of 75% (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Evaluation of DPP showed a similar sensitivity and a better specificity predicting early MFR than quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28440586/