Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog knee surgery recovery and arthritis after rehab with two
By Au, Kevin K et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2010·Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitation and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of medium to large breed dogs with a torn cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) underwent surgery to stabilize their knee, either with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) or lateral fabellar suture stabilization (LFS). After both surgeries, the dogs participated in the same physical rehabilitation program. Over the next two years, all dogs showed significant improvement in their ability to use the affected leg, although X-rays revealed increased signs of arthritis in both groups. Ultimately, both surgical methods were effective, and there was no clear advantage of one technique over the other in terms of recovery.
People also search for: dog knee surgery recovery · TPLO vs LFS for dogs · dog torn ACL treatment · dog arthritis after surgery · dog physical therapy after knee surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare short- and long-term functional and radiographic outcome of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) injury in dogs treated with postoperative physical rehabilitation and either tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) or lateral fabellar suture stabilization (LFS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. ANIMALS: Medium to large breed dogs with naturally occurring CrCL injury (n=65). METHODS: Dogs with CrCL injury were treated with either TPLO or LFS and with identical physical rehabilitation regimes postoperatively. Limb peak vertical force (PVF) was measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, and 7 weeks, and 6 months and 24 months postoperatively. Stifles were radiographically assessed for osteoarthrosis (OA) preoperatively and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-five dogs had LFS and 30 dogs had TPLO. Radiographic OA scores were significantly increased at 24 months compared with preoperative scores in all dogs. Radiographic OA scores preoperatively and at 24 months were not significantly different between treatment groups. PVF was significantly increased from preoperative to 24 months among both treatment groups but not significantly different between treatment groups preoperatively or at 3, 5, 7 weeks, 6, or 24 months. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in outcome as determined by ground reaction forces or radiographic OA scores were found between dogs with CrCL injury treated with LFS or TPLO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LFS and TPLO remain good options for stabilizing stifles with CrCL injury with all dogs showing significant functional improvement. This study does not support the superiority of either surgical technique.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20210964/